Mixed economy allows the producers to have freedoms like what to make. In this economy, the government also gets to set reatrictions to protect their citizens. Market would not be appropriate because there are not any constrictions on what can and cannot be made so things like weapons could freely, carelessly be distributed.
Answer:The correct option is A (Native Americans began charging fees to cross their land. )
Explanation:
During the 1890s, groups were still periodically determined from the Panhandle of Texas to Montana. Be that as it may, railways had extended to cover a large portion of the country, and meat pressing plants were manufactured nearer to real farming zones, making long dairy cattle drives to the railheads pointless.
It showed up in Western America amid the 1880s as an immediate English interpretation of vaquero, got from vaca, the Spanish word signifying "dairy animals," which originated from the Latin word vacca. It depicted a person who oversaw dairy cattle while mounted on horseback.
Probably because they triggered the intervention of the US in the war.
Explanation:
The sinking of the Lusitania (with the loss of civilian American lives) produced a huge resentment in the public opinion against unrestricted submarine warfare launched by the German Navy. Probably the Lusitania (like other "neutral" freighters) was also carrying ammunition to England because there are suspects that its sinking was quite immediate and destructive after the torpedoing but anyway this was an open act of aggression against a clearly marked non-belligerant vessel.
Even worse was the Zimmerman telegram instigating the Mexican government to declare war on the US promising (in case of victory) huge extensions of American territory (Texas, Arizona and New Mexico, if I remember correctly). The "secret" telegram of the exterior minister Zimmerman was intercepted by the British and promptly disclosed to the US autorities...if there were any doubt about intervention this episode certainly settled it down against Germany.
James monroe. thats the answer
Answer:
But no matter which side they fought on, Native Americans were negatively impacted. They were left out of peace talks and lost additional land. After the war, some Americans retaliated against those Indian tribes that had supported the British.
hope this helps! :)