Question

2011, a government commission in Chile approved a $7 billion project. The money was for the construction of five dams across two rivers. Supporters of the dams said that Chile needed them. The dams would help the country grow out of poverty. Opponents, however, pointed out that the dams would have damaged untouched wilderness areas. In 2012, the Supreme Court in Chile blocked the project. The court wanted more research into the dams' impact. Opponents of the dams believe that Chile should develop other forms of energy. The year-round sun of its northern deserts is ideal for producing solar power. Chile could also harness wind power from the gusts along its long Pacific coast.
Opponents want the government to consider _________.
A discounts
B regulations
C laborers
D alternatives

Answer 1

The opponents wanted other forms of energy like solar and wind power, this leaves them looking for alternatives. Therefore, the government should consider option (D): alternatives.

What does the government need to consider?

Rather than looking deep into the Dam construction, the opponents of the dams have various suggestions to develop the potential energy that can be made available in Chile.

Opponents of the dams believe Chile should focus on alternative energy sources. The ever-lighting sunlight of its northern deserts is perfect for solar power generation. Chile might also harness wind energy from the gusts that blow along its Pacific coast.

Therefore, "Opponents want the government to build projects on the alternatives."

Check out the link below to learn more about the Chile government;

brainly.com/question/11644898

#SPJ1