Answer:
Westerners who ruled territories directly denied the influence of natives because they considered the territories as an extension of a home country, so they demanded that natives conform.
The answer is D. Chivalry was a code of conduct for knights.
Answer:
He concludes he will take resources back to the natives of America and bring back some resources to Spain.
Explanation:
The letter is a report of discovery and exploration and is a reflection of the Spanish conquest of the Americas.
The letter contains descriptions and observations of the life and the conduct of the people that participated in the expedition which was the second voyage to the Americas. The letter tells of the interaction and encounters with the natives. The letter tells of the religion practices, civilization and authority.
Columbus concludes that in his future final voyage he would give the native gold, spices and cotton, mastic, aloe, slaves. He also said he would bring back things such as rhubarb and cinnamon and other things that would be discovered by the people that he left behind.
Answer:
1. Roman slavery was not based on race so sometimes it was hard to differ if someone was a slave or not (everyone looked similar).
2. Both roles are pretty similar except for the fact that slaves are forced into labor work and freed men work on their own free will and are treated better.
3. Slaves are abused and treated badly and freemen aren't.
4. Slaves were used in all forms of work except for public office.
5. Often times employed men and slaves would work together except that the free employed men would get paid and the slaves wouldn't (this usually happened when one cannot find enough slaves to work and can only conclude to using paid workers so that's when they end up getting mixed together).
The role of slaves and freemen seem very similar in a lot of aspects (despite the fact that slaves cannot work in public office) but they are ranked by their parents (if your parents are slaves then you're born a slave) and slaves can also be chosen out of something like a battle. If they lose they are taken in as slaves. What I'm trying to say is that freedom was not a right but a privilege for people in the Roman Republic. Things like battles were used to justify and confirm superiority over the losers and gave the winners divine right to rule over the losers (slaves) and treat them badly. At a point the slaves were practically invisible.
Explanation:
ik know i already answer this one but can you give brainlist again
I am pretty sure that it is the legislative branch.
