For the answer to the question above asking who does the writer, think was the best English monarch? Who is the writer you are talking about? Well one of the best English monarchs is Alfred the Great he ruled in <span>(849 AD - 899 AD)
</span>King of the southern Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Wessex and one of the outstanding figures of English history, as much for his social and educational reforms as for his military successes against the Danes. He is the only English monarch known as 'the Great'. built up the defenses of his kingdom to ensure that it was not threatened by the Danes again. He reorganized his army and built a series of well-defended settlements across southern England. He also established a navy for use against the Danish raiders who continued to harass the coast.He defended his kingdom with the vicious and ruthless Vikings. though Queen Elizabeth I can still be a possible answer.
McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Third-person point of view
Explanation:
In third person narrative style, pronouns such as "he," "she," "him," "her," "his," and "them.", etc are used. This point of view is very common and tells the story from the perspective of the person speaking or telling the story or narration.
Therefore, from the given excerpt, the point of view that is used is third-person point of view/narrative.
Answer:
Hello mother,
Explanation:
Hello mother, I know it has been a while since we have talked. And I just wanted to say how much i've missed you. Its been really gloomy and sad around here being only me, and I wish I could be with you right now, and I promise I will, but for now this is the way things must be. (idrk i just wanted points)
