<h2><u><em>
In this lesson, we learned to watch, listen, draw conclusions, and ask questions in order to discover a character’s perspective. Now, it’s your turn to do the same for a character in your novel!</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
Select an event from your novel or short story that helps the reader understand the protagonist’s perspective. What do they think and believe about the events and characters in the story? How do you know? Describe the event or situation in three to five complete sentences. (Use this event and the surrounding text to complete the remainder of your assignment.)</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
State the title of your novel or short story and the name of your protagonist.</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
Book Title: The Necklace</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
Character: Mathilde Loisel</em></u></h2><h2><u><em>
Event that develops point of view:</em></u></h2>
The word 'patriotism' comes from England.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
a culture region can be many countries
No I do not agree with this statement that juveniles who commit violent crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole because it is unconstitutional.
Explanation:
A study on adolescent’s brain development confirms the understanding that children the mindset of the children different from adults, which is important for identifying age-appropriate sentence for the crimes they commit.
Instead to control the juvenile crimes, the government needs to form and implement some strict laws which can really make some kind of fear in the mind of the children before they go on the path of crime.
If we pick terrorism, Marx and Engels' theory can help us understand that young males in the low social classes, who live in staggeringly unequal societies such as the Arab ones (Arab countries have very high GDP due to oil, yet alarming poverty rates) may feel oppressed and marginalized from the "game" of capital-building.
The problem of inequality in a society's economy might help us understand, in general, how religious fundamentalists have risen in these countries, and how the "Guerrillas" started decades ago in South America, all third world countries who veer their hatred towards the more privileged developed world. We can also remember that the Nazi movement saw its inception in a post-WWI Germany with such high rates of inflation that people brought wheelbarrows stacked with cash to the bakery when buying food, and how these people veered their anger onto a historically wealthy and productive people: the Jews. From this perspective, the true breeding pools of murderous ideologies and massive violent reactions always seem to be highly unequal societies.
On the other hand, Marx and Engels' view of Capitalism as a system that inherently causes suffering, where the rich are to blame for poverty itself and where there is always an oppressor and an oppressed, may divert us from the real problem regarding how demagogues weaponize the dispossessed. The young males that usually end up as militants for these causes feel disenfranchised by society as a whole, not only in the financial sphere of their lives but also socially and psychologically. The belief that the solution to social inequality is just to finance the poor so that they are economically equal to what Marxism would call the "bourgeoisie", is reductionist at best. Since the problem of being disenfranchised by society engulfs the entire individual in all aspects of life, inequality in society needs to be looked at as a problem that is educational, psychological and sociological besides just financial. This includes the fact that viewing the world in terms of only oppressor vs. oppressed is the sign of an immature psyche, the kind of psyche that a demagogue finds easy to manipulate.
