Answer:
The tone is kind of mysterious because no one knows what is going to happen next.
Explanation:
Answer:
The phrase "an all-white jury" shows<u> how unfair and biased the justice system was during the 1930s. </u>"Racism" was the major issue in here because the men who were convicted were not judged fairly. There was not a single African American among the juries at first. The decision of death penalty was<em> also very quick.</em>
Explanation:
The question above is related to the "Scottboro Boys," a group of nine African American men who were wrongly accused of raping<em> two white women.</em>
The system was, obviously, unfair thus, a retrial was made. This time, African Americans became part of the jury. This led to a drop of the charges, but it still represented a "failure" when it comes to the justice system long time ago.
I know for a fact that either B. or C. is correct. I think C.
Answer:
- Yes, because it is a topic that he has a strong interest in.
Explanation:
The 'enforcement of the smoking policy' would surely be a great topic for David to present as a persuasive speech as he seems quite interested in sharing his views and concern regarding the 'littering of cigarette butts on the places' and 'administration impotency to reinforce smoking ban'. His strong views and concern would help <u>convince the audience as well as the authorities to execute the smoking policy logically and effectively</u> in order to make people value the 'no smoking signs' and 'not littering around everywhere with those(cigarette butts)'. Thus, it would be a good topic for him.
