1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ValentinkaMS [17]
2 years ago
13

According to Bossuet, what would happen if there was no absolute leader?

History
1 answer:
Anna [14]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Everything would fall into peices and there would be absolute confusion

Explanation:

this is because nobody has a real means of where to go and what to do, because nobody would be leading.

You might be interested in
24. Which of the following was a non-violent protest in which bus riders rode through southern states to
Komok [63]

Answer:

a. freedom ride

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which label on the map shows the location of the Aegean Sea
aleksandrvk [35]

Answer:

hope this helps

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which pair of Supreme Court cases upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases?
kirill115 [55]

The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966). Hence, the correct statement is option C.

<h3>What happened in the case of Wainwright and Arizona?</h3>

In this case, the Supreme Court declared that the Fourteenth Amendment creates a right for criminal defendants who cannot pay for their own lawyers to have state-appointed attorneys on their behalf.

The missing information is given below:

A. Baker v. Carr (1962) and Engel v. Vitale (1962)

B. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Roe v. Wade (1973)

C. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

D. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) and Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964)

Hence, The Supreme Court case that upheld the right to counsel for defendants in criminal cases was Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) and Miranda v. Arizona (1966).  the correct statement is option C.

learn more about  case of Wainwright and Arizona:

brainly.com/question/10320938

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
When the Aryans migrated to India, what influential concept did they bring to the country?
tatiyna
Their Language And Culture
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
according to the 10th amendment, who has powers not specifically given to the national government and not specifically forbidden
olga_2 [115]
They are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which nation started out as a member of the Triple Alliance, but switched sides right after the war began?
    7·1 answer
  • Two values learnt from indian freedom struggle
    7·1 answer
  • How many kilometers would have been traveled by traders from Spain to the United States?
    7·1 answer
  • The first of South Carolina's many and varied state parks date back to what era?
    11·1 answer
  • How has federalism impacted political systems?
    10·1 answer
  • Why was president lincoln killed ​
    11·2 answers
  • What is ancient Greek religion
    10·2 answers
  • The two key inventions in the late 19th century that erased distance and kept factories working day and night were?
    13·2 answers
  • 20 point
    14·2 answers
  • 100 points giveaway 4 time limited edition giveaway
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!