Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
Answer:
He argued that he was the right leader to take on American Indians. He convinced voters that he could pull the country out of a depression. He was the first to campaign for the support of the wealthy man
Answer:
D Native Americans interacted and cooperated with the explorers.
Explanation:
Their mission was to explore the unknown territory, establish trade with the Natives and affirm the sovereignty of the United States in the region. One of their goals was to find a waterway from the US to the Pacific Ocean.
Famously, Sacagawea helped them on their journey at only 16! and she was pregnant at the time. She and her people knew the land well and helped them reach the pacific and navigate the Louisiana purchase to the Pacific Ocean.
Hope it helps!
-colin
