The leaders which were key to the independence movement in South America were b) Simon Bolivar and d) Jose de San Martin. Jose de San Martin "was an Argentine general and the prime leader of the southern part of South America's successful struggle for independence from the Spanish Empire." Simon Bolivar was "a Venezuelan military and political leader who played an instrumental role in the establishment of Venezuela, Ecuador, Bolivia, Peru, and Colombia as sovereign states, independent of Spanish rule."
For me, it is the Helsinki Accords were Ford's most noteworthy remote approach achievement and the Camp David Accords were Carter's. The Helsinki Final Act was an understanding marked by 35 countries that finished up the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, held in Helsinki, Finland.
-It would take weeks for information from one place to reach another, or to travel from one place to another
- They most likely had issues with religion,rebellions, and government issues.
- Keeping the kingdom intact was hard because of invasion Longer borders cost more to defend against outsiders. Egypt struggled to protect their expansive borders against invaders.
- They had to have a big army that cost a lot of grain to stay fed
-The erosion of the authority of the Pharaoh and the accompanying growing power of the nobility and priesthood. This led to the decentralization of power in Egypt and constant power struggles and civil war.
Community policing arose out of the need to better connect with minority groups following and during the Civil Rights Movement. The movement had shown police to be hostile, violent, and obstructive in the methods. In response to this, police forces deemed it better to work with and learn from the communities instead of using force due to lack of understanding. This program eventually evolved into cultural learning programs in which multicultural education became a priority.
Answer:
A. Political Elite
Explanation:
The Elite of the South were wealthy plantation owners who had political influence in state governments due to their immense amount of wealth.
