Communism: It is the ideology of a way of organizing a society in which the government owns the things that are used to make and transport products (such as land, oil, factories, ships, etc.) and there is no privately owned property.
Marxism VS Leninism : It is the theory given by karl marx which pushes his ideology of self-liberation of working class from It is against all forms of dominations in the society - COMPLETE LIBERALISATION. He wanted to destroy capitalist nature/structure of the society where the relation of buying and selling was present in every field/corner of life.
" Marxists aim to enhance the freedom of working class people chiefly by expanding the scope of collective action and the possibilities for individual growth and creativity within that."
It was more like an urban dictatorship, economy played a major role in application of this communism theory in Russia - Lenin thought that the right time for applying Marxism in Russia is yet to come so why not apply/give a modified theory & that's where Leninism came into action. Now the power was taken from the so called working-class (which constituted urban dictatorship) and was given in the hands of a communist party.
Naxalism vs Maoism : Both these theories originated from naxalbari (a village in west Bengal - a state in India). Maoism is taken from Chinese political leader
Mao Zedong whose main thought process was ---> "Power flows from the barrel of the gun". Whereas Naxalism originated as a rebellion against marginalization of the poor forest dwellers and gradually against the lack of development and poverty at the local level in rural parts of eastern India.
<span>Difference: Naxalites take part in elections and many of them are registered parties with the Election Commission of India, Maoists do not support the electoral politics. Secondly, the Naxalites may or may not have an armed wing, but the existence of the Maoists depend on their armed militia.</span>
Answer:
The intellectual movement, known as the Enlightenment urged individuals to think for themselves rather than aimlessly following position, be it mainstream or strict. All of us in invested with reason, so the scholars of the Enlightenment contended, and we should draw upon that load of reason in exploring our way through life's numerous dangerous parkways and byways.
In connection to political life, reason must be utilized to develop suffering organizations that will give us appropriate edified administration rather than the oppression to which a foolish adherence to custom and convention regularly lead.
This was correctly what the American pioneers tried to do. Saturated with Enlightenment thinking, they intentionally set out to construct an arrangement of government on reasonable standards. Rather than aimlessly obliging the framework that they'd acquired from the British, they left upon a profoundly aspiring and exceptional undertaking of state-fabricating that would fuse illuminated standards.
Answer:
Sourcing is the correct answer
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B.
United Nations proposal to Palestine after World War II was to <span>divide Palestine into two states--one for the Jews and one for the Arabs.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!