Answer:
D.It resolves the major conflict of the poem by showing that Peterkin has found something by the rivulet.
Jesus was a man who, according to the various books of the Bible, was the son of God. They speak of their passage through the world as an act of God´s redemption for the world, since sin had generated a state of crisis that could even destroy the social foundations, and this problem could not be solved even by the rulers of the epoch.
Even personally I do not believe in Jesus, the simple fact Christianity is a religion which allows the people to do the correct and help the others is so respectable.
Answer:
d. all of the above
Explanation:
Arbitration is a legal technique of resolving disputes outside the courts, whereby parties involved in the dispute refer it to an arbitrator (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal") or arbitrators( one or more persons) , by whose decision (the "award") they may be bound(as in mandatory arbitration) or not(as in voluntary or nonbinding arbitration).
The above methods of arbitration :peer review, arbitration, mediation all allow the dispute parties' input before arbitration decision. Peer review method involves dispute resolution in the workplace whereby employees are able to take disputes to fellow employees and managers to act as arbitrator to resolve disputes which may not be binding on the parties. Mediation on another hand is a dynamic method of dispute resolution where a third party helps to resolve disputes by helping dispute parties negotiate to resolve to dispute. Arbitration however differs from mediation in that the arbitrator makes decisions based on evidence presented and not waiting to negotiate an agreement between both parties. All three methods however require dispute parties to make inputs so as to arrive on final decision.
Answer:
the bystander effect.
Explanation:
According to the bystander effect one is less likely to help a person when there number of people in the vicinity is high.
The reasons why this happens is due to three factors, diffusion of responsibility, ambiguity and behaving according to social norms.
- Diffusion of responsibility
When there are a lot of people around one might think that someone else will take the responsibility of taking action. This may happen as one might think that someone else might be better suited to handle the situation
If the situation is not clearly understood by the bystander then they will be less likely to help.
One might think if they would help it would be going against the social norms and hence hesitate to do so.
Here, Mr. Hughes has decided not to help because of the diffusion of responsibility.
Hence, his reaction illustrates the bystander effect.
