Do you have any answers to choose from
In grammar, a subject complement<span> is a predicative expression that follows a linking verb (copula) and that complements the subject of the sentence by either (</span><span>1) renaming it or (2) describing it. In the former case, a renaming </span>noun<span> phrase such as a </span>noun<span> or pronoun is </span>called<span> a predicative ... </span>An<span> adjective following the copula and describing the subject</span>
The first alternative is correct (A).
The text talks about virus infection on a person's computer, which can be monitored from there.
That is, the passage has a specific subject whose exchange of experiences can contribute to a better understanding of the problem. In this context, the interlocutor can, for example, tell a particular experience in which he or she had to deal with a virus in his computer, giving details of what happened and how it was solved.
C. He is kicked in the head during the rumble.
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
it seems like its the opposite of livid
<span>In the lines 8-12 of "A child said...", he can't provide an exact definition of the grass, as he knows it no more than a child does. But he can say one thing for certain: the grass doesn't discriminate between different people. It grows everywhere, among blacks as well as whites, in different places of the world.
In the lines 14-25 of “I understand the large hearts….” Whitman doesn't just sympathize, but identifies with all the oppressed - a woman who was burned for allegedly being a witch, a hounded slave who was tortured. He says "All these I feel or am". So, he has more than empathy for his fellow creatures, no matter what their circumstances were, or their fate.</span>
