<u>Own sewage systems After the Public Health Act;</u>
The 1848 Public Health Act was the absolute first law on general wellbeing to be passed in the United Kingdom. It set up a Central Board of Health whose activity it was to improve sanitation and expectations for everyday comforts in towns and crowded territories in England and Wales.
Its motivation was to arrange past measures planned for fighting messy urban living conditions, which caused different wellbeing dangers, including the spread of numerous illnesses, for example, cholera and typhus.
In July 1842, the most significant nineteenth Century production on social change was discharged, titled, 'Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Laboring Population of Great Britain'.
This investigation into sanitation was the mind offspring of a legal counselor, Edwin Chadwick (1800-1890). It took such huge numbers of years for the administration to move different urban areas to make their own sewage frameworks.
Three of the factors in Russia which fostered the revolution of 1917 were the impoverishment of the peasants who struggled to survive on their small plots of land and to pay the debts they owed to buy their land after the serf system was changed; many peasants who couldn't make a go of it fled to the cities and took part in the local industrial revolution but were oppressed by inadequate wages and poor working conditions and lastly WWI resulted in the poor masses in Russia being used as canon fodder in an unjust imperialist war to divide up the world differently unlike WWII which was to end the Nazi tyrrany.
All of these answers could be true, I know for a fact that A is true, could you give more context?
Answer: A) Hobbes thought people were innately violent.
<u>Further explanation</u>:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
