During the enlightenment era and also during the classical period major philosophers believed that a dependable guide to human thinking was reason and logic. By using reason and logic and also principles of humanism humans were capable of guiding their thinking effectively.
When the debates over the 3/5th Compromise was had, in relation to the above options, the answer is none of the above.
<h3>What happened during the debate for the 3/5h compromise?</h3>
The delegates from the Southern part of the states argued that enslaved people should be treated as people if it came to voting and representation.
They did this to ensure that they would have more representation in Congress even though their population was less than the North.
Find out more on the 3/5th Compromise at brainly.com/question/744051.
They allowed investors to take fewer risk.
The agreement that divided Congress into a bicameral system, the Senate and the House of Representatives, is called The Great Compromise. It was the final result of a debate among the delegates on how representation would be set in the states. Delegates gathered in the Constitutional Convention and in the end, both small state and large state representatives agreed on this. The Senate called for equal representation, in favor of the smaller states The House of Representatives called for proportional representation, or representation based on population, which favored the large states.
Hope this helps. Good luck! :)
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with these negotiations leading to rebellion in China, since many people were worried about unwanted western cultural influence. </span></span>
