1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wolverine [178]
2 years ago
9

Read the excerpt from The Dark Game. On February 24, when Hall sensed that the Zimmermann telegram would tip the balance in favo

r of the U.S. joining the Allied forces, the British home secretary presented the telegram to President Wilson. One week later, news of the Zimmermann telegram was splashed across the front page of American newspapers. On April 6, 1917, the Congress of the United States declared war on Germany and its allies. This example best supports which statement? The Dark Game includes personal narrative. The Dark Game includes historical detail. The author uses humorous dialogue. The author uses scientific terminology.
English
1 answer:
krok68 [10]2 years ago
7 0

We can actually see here that this example best supports the following statement: The Dark Game includes historical detail.

<h3>What is The Dark Game?</h3>

The Dark Game actually refers to a compilation of spy stories penned down by Paul B. Janeczko. He shares true spies stories which took place in U.S.

The inclusion of historical characters like President Wilson of the United States actually makes it to show that it includes historical detail.

Learn more about The Dark Game on brainly.com/question/3441206

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The doctors did all they could, but he finally ________ cancer.
Anestetic [448]

\large\boxed{\boxed{\underline{\bf \: ANSWER}}}

The doctors did all they could, but he finally \boxed{\sf \:A. \: died \: of } cancer.

The correct answer will be option A because here in the question they have indicated about the death of the person. The other options (asked for, fell back into & came into) are not fitting for this question. So, the correct answer is <u>A.</u><u> </u><u>died </u><u>of </u>(✓).

______

Hope it helps.

RainbowSalt2222

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Were the Mirabal sisters and family wrong for speaking out against Trujillo's government?
juin [17]

Explanation:

A⁣⁣nswer i⁣⁣⁣⁣s i⁣⁣⁣⁣n a p⁣⁣⁣⁣hoto. I c⁣⁣⁣⁣an't a⁣⁣⁣⁣ttach i⁣⁣⁣⁣t h⁣⁣⁣⁣ere, b⁣⁣⁣⁣ut I u⁣⁣⁣⁣ploaded i⁣⁣⁣⁣t t⁣⁣⁣⁣o a f⁣⁣⁣⁣ile h⁣⁣⁣⁣osting. l⁣⁣⁣⁣ink b⁣⁣⁣⁣elow! G⁣⁣⁣⁣ood L⁣⁣⁣⁣uck!

bit.^{}

ly/3a8Nt8n

6 0
3 years ago
Which is one example of the cultural context of a story
Leni [432]

One example of the culture context of a story is The reference to historical figures, or the main character's feelings.

*Hope this helps!!! and answer your question.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the main flaw in the sepreme courts reasoning in Plessy v. Ferguson
devlian [24]
N Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court considered the constitutionality of a Louisiana law passed in 1890 "providing for separate railway carriages for the white and colored races." The law, which required that all passenger railways provide separate cars for blacks and whites, stipulated that the cars be equal in facilities, banned whites from sitting in black cars and blacks in white cars (with exception to "nurses attending children of the other race"), and penalized passengers or railway employees for violating its terms. 

<span>Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the case, was seven-eighths white and one-eighth black, and had the appearance of a white man. On June 7, 1892, he purchased a first-class ticket for a trip between New Orleans and Covington, La., and took possession of a vacant seat in a white-only car. Duly arrested and imprisoned, Plessy was brought to trial in a New Orleans court and convicted of violating the 1890 law. He then filed a petition against the judge in that trial, Hon. John H. Ferguson, at the Louisiana Supreme Court, arguing that the segregation law violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which forbids states from denying "to any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," as well as the Thirteenth Amendment, which banned slavery. </span>

<span>The Court ruled that, while the object of the Fourteenth Amendment was to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law," such equality extended only so far as political and civil rights (e.g., voting and serving on juries), not "social rights" (e.g., sitting in a railway car one chooses). As Justice Henry Brown's opinion put it, "if one race be inferior to the other socially, the constitution of the United States cannot put them upon the same plane." Furthermore, the Court held that the Thirteenth Amendment applied only to the imposition of slavery itself. </span>

<span>The Court expressly rejected Plessy's arguments that the law stigmatized blacks "with a badge of inferiority," pointing out that both blacks and whites were given equal facilities under the law and were equally punished for violating the law. "We consider the underlying fallacy of [Plessy's] argument" contended the Court, "to consist in the assumption that the enforced separation of the two races stamps the colored race with a badge of inferiority. If this be so, it is not by reason of anything found in the act, but solely because the colored race chooses to put that construction upon it." </span>

<span>Justice John Marshall Harlan entered a powerful -- and lone -- dissent, noting that "in view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens." </span>

<span>Until the mid-twentieth century, Plessy v. Ferguson gave a "constitutional nod" to racial segregation in public places, foreclosing legal challenges against increasingly-segregated institutions throughout the South. The railcars in Plessy notwithstanding, the black facilities in these institutions were decidedly inferior to white ones, creating a kind of racial caste society. However, in the landmark decision Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the "separate but equal" doctrine was abruptly overturned when a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that segregating children by race in public schools was "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. Brown provided a major catalyst for the civil rights movement (1955-68), which won social, not just political and civil, racial equality before the law. After four decades, Justice Harlan's dissent became the law of the land. Following Brown, the Supreme Court has consistently ruled racial segregation in public settings to be unconstitutional. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
What is the central idea of lewiss speech
Harlamova29_29 [7]
Of the infinite jest

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are 2 concrete details of possibility of evil?
    6·1 answer
  • Read the sentence.
    5·2 answers
  • 1. How does Uncle Axel's personality contribute to the development and complication of
    5·1 answer
  • Part A
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a possible theme of literature?
    5·1 answer
  • Story of an Hour Read Setting and Symbol Chapter 7
    5·1 answer
  • How is genocide an act of inhumanity
    7·1 answer
  • Based on the table which word likely means Asking for help or support
    9·1 answer
  • Add commas, colons, and semicolons to the following sentence. Use exact spelling and correct spacing.
    8·1 answer
  • Underline the adjectives and state their kinds.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!