If the possible answers are:
<span>a. The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.
b. The events in Rwanda show that genocide has stopped because of the effects of the Holocaust.
c. The events in Rwanda show that the international community has forgotten the impact of the Holocaust.
d. The events in Rwanda show that the international community no longer cares about the effects of the Holocaust.
Then the correct answer is </span>a. The events in Rwanda show that genocide can still happen, despite the impact of the Holocaust.
The genocide in Rwanda happened after the holocaust and shows that no matter how hard the community tries, such monstrosities can still happen. The genocide in Rwanda was based around the similar principle as that in Germany. There was a group who perceived that their ethnicity was higher than that of another ethnicity and tried to eliminate them completely.
Answer:
Mussolini wanted to expand Italy back to the days of the Roman Empire, which included a large chunk of Africa. Abyssinia/Ethiopia was part of this, and the Italians, with their really really really really really bad army, failed to take Ethiopian territory in the 19th century during the days of imperialism. He could have invaded anywhere else, but would have started a war against Britain or France way earlier before WWII since most of Northern Africa was British or French territories.
Explanation:
Ur answer is C let me know if im right :)