Answer:
III. Concept maps help you record connections between ideas and sources.
IV. Concept maps are visual organizers of ideas.
Explanation:
A concept map is a graphical visualization tool in which knowledge (abstract ideas) are organized by using boxes or circles having specific colors, and the relationships between these abstract ideas are illustrated by connecting either arrows or lines.
In a concept map, the boxes or circles represents concept while the arrows or lines represent the relationship between them. The concept map was designed and developed in 1972 by Joseph D. Novak.
Hence, the following statements are true and correct about the concept maps;
1. Concept maps help you record connections between ideas and sources.
2. Concept maps are visual organizers of ideas.
3. Concept maps are helpful when synthesizing information for both academic research and non-academic purposes.
4. Concept maps are not generally included in a final paper.
<em>Generally, concept maps help users to enhance their critical thinking skills, improves reasoning, identify and visualization of priorities, enhance high-order understanding etc.</em>
The rapeh in the house
A young man rapedh a girl while she was in the bathroom all by herself then the parents came and did damages to the girl some negligence happened right there. the veredict says that the young man should go to jail. in the courtroom the girl cries and the veredict torts the young man. the young men is found guilt. The veredict gives him a penalty of 35 years in jail.
I just did something random and got a 100% on edgenuit
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was passed in 1854, and according to this act, slavery was permitted throughout Kansas and Nebraska, and these two states were supposed to be admitted into the Union. However, there were many riots, both from pro-slavery movement, and anti-slavery movement, so the act didn't come into effect.
I would definitely be against the Act because, like I said, it allowed slavery in those two states. Slavery is illegal - you cannot be the owner of any person because we are all people. And given that according to this Act, that is exactly what you could do in those states, I would have definitely opposed it then, and now.
I would say that there is a possibility that people won't be able to relate to those proverbs, ans they come from a different time (silly example: proverbs that described weather in certain months become irrelevant with global warming!)
There is also a possibility that they would recognize something that is relevant to their lives, an advice, that they can use: this will they make them feel validated that they're not the first people to feel like this and that will help them consequently follow their plans.
