The answer is Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. He was German thinker who built up a dialectcal plan that accentuated the advance of history and of thoughts from proposal to absolute opposite and thereupon to a blend.
Hegel was the remainder of the colossal philosophical framework manufacturers of present day times. His work, endless supply of Immanuel Kant, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, and Friedrich Schelling, subsequently denotes the zenith of traditional German reasoning
Answer:
Cross-Sectional Research Method
Explanation:
Cross-Sectional Research Method often referred to as cross-sectional analysis, is a form of research study, in which the researcher gather data to make deductions about subjects or population of interest at a particular point in time. It is conducted such that, a researcher might gather data from selected groups of different age, class or level at one point in time. Thus, deductions or inferences can be made based on the age, class or level differences rather than things that occurred over a time.
Hence, Max is considered to be using Cross-sectional research method, since he is using population of different groups based on age to conduct research or gather information.
Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
The Analyses Goal setting and choices as a positive to any relationship and your well-being is below.
<h3>
The role of Goal setting in well being?</h3>
Goal setting is one that aid or help a person to have an improve health and wellbeing, It brings about positive relationships with friends, family or work colleagues and others.
Choice are said to bring about a kind of balance of power in a relationship. Choice enhance well being as it reduces friction and give the source strength if both partners decide together in a relationship.
Learn more about Goal setting from
brainly.com/question/1409468
