Answer:
I assume you are referring to Malcolm Gladwell's article "The Tipping Point". If that's so, the correct answer is C. The similarities between social phenomena and diseases show the significance small changes can have on overall social trends.
Explanation:
<u>Gladwell emphasizes the connection between social phenomena and contagious diseases on the grounds that neither of them necessarily happen in a linear way.</u> In other words, the effects don't have to be proportionate to their causes.
When police tries to tackle the rising violent-crime rate, the common-sense approach would be to introduce drastic measures. But sometimes, even those won't help. Instead, <u>it's often more effective to introduce "the most modest of changes" to "bring about enormous effects"</u>. Those small changes, when accumulated, can just about reach <u>the "tipping point", the point from which things will start improving dramatically</u>.
A famous example was the so-called "broken window" experiment in Palo Alto. The researchers parked a car on a street. The car was left untouched for over a week. When they parked the same car without a licence plate in a similar neighborhood, it was stripped in less than a day. To prove their point completely, they then decided to smash one of its windows. In just a couple of hours, the car was completely destroyed. This experiment (as well as Gladwell's central thesis) shows that violence always invites more violence. Therefore, a tiny change can bring about great results if applied at the right time and place to help reach the tipping point.
This ones correct
<span>B.The students' completed projects were displayed for parents at the open house.
</span>
Answer:
word choice can effect the poem in many ways for example, if the poem is abot electricity and they use the metaphor, “the electricity danced in the sky” it would make the story more upbeat and happier.
Explanation:
Hey!
Hope this helps...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Decision-making helps in many areas (not just candidate picking), this process is the same way with employers picking the right employee...
So if you have a group that is only picking ONE candidate, and the group supports unemployment...
The Candidates are:
> Bob - Who's brother is on unemployment even though he was rightfully fired, but made a strong enough case to get unemployment, and Bob doesn't know how he feels about unemployment.
> Susan - Who's daughter is on employment because she was wrongly fired from a triple digit job, that she was working for, for her entire life. Susan believes the unemployment is a great thing as long as you need it.
> Jerry - Who doesn't believe in unemployment because everyone should get a job, and if you get fired than it is your fault, not the state's...
This group would automatically take Jerry off their list because he doesn't support what they support. They would be a little on edge with Bob, because Bob is unsure about they support. But they would give Susan their full support because she believes in what they believe.
This group used a Decision-making process called "process of elimination" to pick the perfect candidate for what ever they are sponsoring for...