<span>It is clear that the Declaration, written as a physical document, is similar to how one may write a speech. Although there are clear differences, one thing that remains unwavering is the language and flow that the declaration holds, despite only being a written document.</span>
Lighting, furniture, backdrops
Answer: The correct present participle of the word 'freeze' is 'freezing' and the correct past participle is 'frozen'.
Explanation: There are two types of participles: present participle and past participle<u>. </u><u>A present participle is a form of a verb that is characterized by ending in -ing</u>. Present participles can be used in a sentence as adjectives. Furthermore, they can be used to form verb tenses such as the Present Progressive Tense. In that way,<u> the present participle of 'freeze' is 'freezing', which ends in -ing.</u> Moreover, <u>a past participle is the form of a verb that is characterized by ending in -ed, -en, -d, -t or -n.</u> Past participles make reference to a complete action and, as well as present participles, they can be used as adjectives or to form verb tenses. Therefore<u>, the past participle of 'freeze' is 'frozen', which ends in -en. </u>
The narrator decides to murder the old man because he is crazy. I can tell this because he does not like the old man's eye. He calls it a vultures eye even though it is just a normal eye that has gone blind. Also, many times he tries to prove himself that he is not crazy. He even starts the first sentence of his story by asking the readers that why would we think that he has gone mad. It states in the first sentence, "TRUE!—NERVOUS—VERY, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad?" Furthermore, he says for himself that he wanted nothing from his gold or anything like that, he just did not like his eye. In the text it states, "He had never wronged me. He had never given me insult. For his gold I had no desire. I think it was his eye! yes, it was this!" Later, he thinks he can hear the old man's heart, and since he thinks that others can hear it too. Therefore, he kills the old man to protect himself from being discovered. This can be seen in the passage, "But the beating grew louder, louder! I thought the heart must burst. And now a new anxiety seized me—the sound would be heard by a neighbour!" From the textual evidence we can certainly infer that the narrator has gone extremely mad.
