Answer: No it is not a legal for a 24-year-old to date a 39-year-old.
Explanation: it is not illegal because as long as they’re not under the age of 18.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Ambiguity in contracts can be voided if subjected to more than one interpretation and may be dismissed as evidence if the court has determined the Contract falls under ambiguity.
It should be noted that in contract law, a discharge will take place when the parties that are involved have fully performed their duties. Therefore, it's <u>true.</u>
Discharge of a contract simply takes place when the main obligations of a contract end. It should be noted that the ending of the contract entails the termination of the contractual relationship.
Both parties to a contract are discharged when they have completely performed their contractual obligations. Therefore, the operation of law releases the parties from performance.
Learn more about contracts on:
brainly.com/question/25820002
Por lo tanto, los registros policiales no forman parte del sistema judicial, y no se presume que documentos como informes de arrestos o informes de delitos / incidentes que se guardan en los departamentos de policía estén abiertos al público como lo están los registros judiciales.
Answer: The physician is being sued. Insurance company should provide an attorney. If the doctor is negligent, insurance company should pay (that's why we have premiums). Dr. Z is sued, goes to agency, and notifies the agency. The agency doesn't notify Aetna in right amount of time, and also notifies the wrong company. Aetna doesn't have a liability because they were not notified in a timely manner. Larson is agent to Aetna. A principal's notice to agent=notice to principal. That's the same as notifying Aetna according to its claims procedure. This is not Dr.Z's problem. Aetna is wrong in denying coverage, and Dr.Z will succeed and not have to pay.
