What is this mainly about and is this history
Ya sure why wats wrong??? i dont understand pls explain will give the answer efficently my history teacher is sitting 100 cm away from me
Answer: Anonymity allows students to freely express their concepts and criticisms without feeling that they are judged by others.
Explanation:
In the educational field, students are not only focused on learning the curricular contents taught by teachers, but the social part where they create friendships with each other is also involved. When a student has to make constructive criticism of another classmate, it often does not think about whether the work it did but how its criticism can affect the friendship it has with the person, which interferes to express an objective opinion.
Anonymity would be very useful in this class because it allows students to express their point of view without feeling that they will be judged by their classmates. When a student feels that it can give its opinion, knowing that it will not interfere with their friendship, it feels freer and speaks more clearly.
It is normal to see how sometimes a student can change his behavior towards another if he feels that it expressed itself in a way he did not like about the work done. This gets to interfere with their social dynamics, leading them to the point of losing a friendship. A student does not want to be in a classroom where it knows that his classmate does not want to see him.
If teachers implement anonymity in the feedback process, they will find more extensive opinions and criticisms in the learning process. They will see that students are going to talk more objectively since they will not feel the pressure that they will be signaled by their opinions.
The correct answer is Universal conduct, based on Universal values
Happiness is the state in which a rational being is found in the world for whom, in all his existence, everything goes according to his desire and will; consequently, it presupposes the agreement of nature with all the ends of this being, and simultaneously with the essential foundation of determining its will. Now the moral law, as a law of freedom, obliges by means of foundations of determination, which must be entirely independent of nature and its agreement with our faculty of desire (as an engine). However, the rational agent that acts in the world is not simultaneously the cause of the world and of nature itself. Thus, in the moral law, there is no basis for a necessary connection between morality and happiness, provided with it, in a being that, being part of the world, depends on it; this being, precisely for this reason, cannot voluntarily be the cause of this nature nor, as far as happiness is concerned, make it, by its own strength, perfectly coincide with its own practical principles.
