Answer:
im pretty sure it is the second, and third ones.
Explanation:
hope this helps. im pretty sure that this is right
Answer:
Environmental Impacts of the Electricity System. ... In general, the environmental effects can include: Emissions of greenhouse gases and other air pollutants, especially when a fuel is burned. Use of water resources to produce steam, provide cooling, and serve other functions. Generally speaking, as the human population grows, our consumption of natural resources increases. More humans consume more freshwater, more land, more clothing, etc. The more people on the planet, the more food you need to feed those humans (more fishing, more farming, more deforestation to make room for agriculture and raising livestock, and so forth).
Explanation:
1.free will
2.determinism
3.hereditarianism
4.environmentalism
With the options given in the question, the correct answer is C) the government sets policy for producer and consumers, which guides the economy.
<em>The option that best describes the idea of the “invisible hand” is “the government sets policy for producer and consumers, which guides the economy.”
</em>
The “invisible hand” is a term coined by the economist Adrian Smith in his book “The Wealth of Nations”. It implies that in the market exist an “invisible hand” that helps the demand and supply of goods to maintain a balance.
Observing the graphic attached, another valid affirmation that stems from the information in the graphic could be: producers and consumers work together, which guides the economy.
Answer:
Laura's lawsuit against Bolivia will most likely not prevail because of the Act of state doctrine.
Explanation:
According to this Act, a sovereign state (United States) must respect the independence of any other sovereign state (Bolivia) and, as a result, all the laws and regulations that such sovereign state sets forth. If no US dollars are allowed to enter Bolivia, US citizens traveling to such country have to change US dollars for "Bolivianos", which is the currency used in Bolivia.
In addition, a court (a US court in this case) is not entitled to hear a case where a foreign issue is involved (the fact of exchanging foreign currency). This case cannot be heard nor decided by a US court because that would interfere with the US foreign policy (with Bolivia in this case).
