Both revolutions started rather moderately, with people demanding more representation in government. Neither gained the full support of everyone in the respective nations either, as evidenced by Loyalists in the US and counterrevolutions in areas like the Vendee in France. In France, the revolution became more radical and ideological, taking Enlightenment ideals and rationalism to the extreme. The revolution in France also led to the dictatorship of Napoleon and the restoration is Bourbon monarchs, so ultimately a return to the status quo, while the American Revolution was successful in gaining American independence. Furthermore, the French Revolution was fought in France while the American Revolution was fought in the colonies of England and never sought to completely depose George III, just remove his control of the colonies.
Answer:
I think so that "Oliver Cromwell ".
Answer:
Indirect control
Explanation:
Social Darwinism refers to a social theory that was popular from the 1870s to the early or mid-20th century. This theory argues that the biological concepts of natural selection and survival of the fittest should be applied to human societies. This view states that certain groups of people are weaker, less intelligent or less capable, and that they should not be able to hold significant power, wealth or autonomy. Social Darwinism was influential in the development of ideologies such as authoritarianism, eugenics, racism, imperialism, fascism and Nazism.
This was also primarily present in the indirect method of colonial control. Indirect rule was mainly used by the British and the French in their Asian and African colonies. This was done by maintaining the traditional power structures of these regions, but granting their administration to a small group of European "advisors." This was due to the belief that the European colonists were more intelligent and cultured, and would therefore know what to do in these regions better than the locals themselves.
In that conference, the borders of new nations were artificially drawn. They didn't take into account the real situations and that negatively impacted the Middle East.
The answer is
The Congress has no judicial powers. “The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish”now pls thank me
