Answer:
A site which includes external links to reputable sources
Explanation:
A site with too little text may be trying to avoid the point, or perhaps they really don't know that much. A site with only a few sources listed may be unreliable since they could've just made up what they wrote with no evidence. A site with reputable sources would be the answer since a reputable source would not be indeed reputable without the validations of the people.
Answer:
I would say C
Explanation:
It provides more context (like more of a story). The other options just seem kind of random things and don't provide the story. We can tell that she is going to her grandparents house becuase they are remodeling her house in c.
Answer:
D. perform a quick search to decide the author’s reliability.
Explanation:
If you research the author of an informative piece and find out their notorious for not being credible, it's safe to assume that source is unreliable.
I believe the correct answer is the last one - <span>There is sympathy and support for the children struggling to integrate schools.
The author is talking about an ad that a white man paid to be made so as to show people how cruel and inhumane they are to those people of a different skin color. He wanted to show his gratitude and surprise about how there are still people who want to fight for equality and who want to give every child an opportunity to have an education.
</span>
Answer: the third one (c)
Explanation:
it says things like “following”
