Which cross-sectional shapes do you find the most surprising? Explain why.
1 answer:
By critically observing the cross-sections of the three-dimensional object I used, a cone is the cross-sectional shape I find most surprising.
<h3>The cross-section of a three-dimensional object?</h3>In this exercise, you're required to use an online tool to investigate and determine the cross-sections of three-dimensional objects such as pyramids, cylinders, cones, etc., by passing different planes through them.
By critically observing the cross-sections of the three-dimensional object I used, a cone is the cross-sectional shape I find most surprising because rotating the slice around Y produced a circular curve that transitioned into a parabolic curve.
Read more on cross-sections here: brainly.com/question/1924342
#SPJ1
You might be interested in
Answer:
The rate at which the distance from the plane to the station is increasing is 331 miles per hour.
Step-by-step explanation:
We can find the rate at which the distance from the plane to the station is increasing by imaging the formation of a right triangle with the following dimensions:
a: is one side of the triangle = altitude of the plane = 3 miles
b: is the other side of the triangle = the distance traveled by the plane when it is 4 miles away from the station and an altitude of 3 miles
h: is the hypotenuse of the triangle = distance between the plane and the station = 4 miles
First, we need to find b:
(1)
Now, to find the rate we need to find the derivative of equation (1) with respect to time:
Since "da/dt" is constant (the altitude of the plane does not change with time), we have:
And knowing that the plane is moving at a speed of 500 mi/h (db/dt):
Therefore, the rate at which the distance from the plane to the station is increasing is 331 miles per hour.
I hope it helps you!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
-Greatest common factor is defined as the greatest positive that divides a set of whole numbers evenly and without a remainder.
-Given the set
we notice, that the GCF can't be an integer with the power of x greater than 2:
Since, there's no other positive integer than can evenly divide the set of quotients, the GCF is