"The best way to spread Christmas cheer is singing loud for all to hear."
I apologize if this is incorrect or unhelpful.
Miranda incriminated himself without knowing that he could refuse. I hope this helps. ;-)
The charter boat needed to use the joint stock companies phone to a police.
The following is missing for the question to be complete:
1. They should indicate problems may exist
2. They should answer "unknown" to any questions about plumbing
3. They should indicate that there are known plumbing problems
4. They should note the fact that it's an older system and potential buyers should have it professionally examined
Answer: 2. They should answer "unknown" to any questions about plumbing
Explanation: Since Madison had no problems with the pipes in the water system, i.e there was nothing to indicate that there was corrosion in the pipes, she simply could not know that she needed to examine the water system as a site of potential problem. As stated, the whole house is old, and substantial problems in such a house can occur everywhere. When filling in any questionnaire or form in the place provided for the plumbing system, it should be put "unknown" because there was no external sign that the pipes were corroded. Of course, even a real estate agent does not know this, and it is always possible, before purchasing a home by a new prospective buyer, to hire one of the experts to review and evaluate what may be the breakdowns and potential issues that may affect the price of the home when buying. The prospective buyer can simply consult with an expert all the items of the home where their condition is noted as "unknown".
Answer:
Explanation:
According to Wikipedia, ***"The rule of four is not required by the Constitution, any law, or even the Supreme Court's own published rules. Rather, it is a custom that has been observed since the Court was given discretion over which appeals to hear by the Judiciary Act of 1891It is a working rule devised by the Court as a practical mode of determining that a case is deserving of review, the theory being that if four Justices find that a legal question of general importance is raised, that is ample proof that the question has such importance. This is a fair enough rule of thumb on the assumption that four Justices find such importance on an individualized screening of the cases sought to be reviewed."***
Rhis modus operandi helps to streamline the quality and amount of appeal that is granted Certiorari by ensuring that only very important question is given consideration.
This would hence discard those questions, scenarios or appeals that does not win the vote of the four justices.
Hence it is a not so favorable procedure to the minority masses holding a claim that seems trivial in the surface.
But this procedure should remain.
And also, camera's should not be prohibited in the court room. This helps to test for objectivity.
