<u>Answer:</u>
For those people watching football games from their home without spending money on tickets, football for them is nonrival and nonexcludable.
Option: (D)
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Non rival means the consumption of service by consumer without avoiding others to use it.
- Like the football match watching from balcony they are not preventing any other users from watching it.
- Similarly nonexcludable also means the goods or service which cannot be excluded to the people by the use of one consumer, as in case of the match viewer from balcony.
Answer:
Social conventional reasoning
Explanation:
Social conventional reasoning is common among adults and adolescents. This kind of reasoning is based on judging the level of morality of a action by comparing with the expectations or views of the society. an individual's obedience to rules are not based on moral reasoning but based on what the society expects.
Fernando's reasoning is conventional because he focuses on the rules of the society to control his behavior.
Distracted drivers under the age of 20 involved in fatal crashes were reported to have been distracted while driving, according to NHTSA.
<h3>What is distracted driving?</h3>
Distracted driving is defined as any activity that diverts attention away from driving, such as talking or texting on your phone, eating and drinking, conversing with passengers, fiddling with the stereo, entertainment, or navigation system — anything that diverts your attention away from the task of safe driving.
Texting is the most hazardous distraction. For five seconds, reading or sending a text message diverts your focus from the road. That is the same as traveling a football field with your eyes closed at 55 mph.
You cannot drive safely unless you give your whole attention to the task of driving. Any non-driving activity is a possible distraction and raises your chances of accident.
To learn more about class visit:
brainly.com/question/18048790
#SPJ4
Answer: 1650 according to 3 sources
Explanation:
Hate speech is and only is legal under the first amendment when no one is being put in danger by the speech. For example, you can say you hate this person but you can not say I hate this person and I will kill this person.
