Answer:
Could you explain what you area sking
Explanation:
SO i can asnwer
Answer:
c. "But their sacrifice brought results. Slowly, but surely, restaurants throughout the South began to abandon their policies of segregation."
Explanation:
The question above is related to the "sit-in movement" that happened in the USA (starting <em>1960</em>). The movement was a non-violent one and it was meant to give the African-Americans the<u> same, equal rights with the white peopl</u>e. It took many sacrifices before the movement showed results.
It started with the lunch-counter sit-in in Greensboro, North Carolina. This was followed by other people in the USA who also did the tactics as a support for desegregation of races. Though it took time, the restaurants throughout the South began to abandon their policies of segregation. This statement best supports the idea regarding the violence that the activists endured while doing the movement. The people who participated were subjected to<em> verbal abuse </em>and<em> assault</em>, but they suffered in order to achieve a <em>greater cause.</em>
Making a decision
Answer confirmed
Answer and Explanation:
Thoreau claimed that it was fair to promote civil disobedience when the government promoted malefic laws that promoted the return of humanity. This concept was also defended by Martin Luther King, Malala, among other great thinkers who fight against unjust and harmful laws. We can confirm that the rejection of these types of laws and disobedience are essential to prevent those laws from continuing in a region. In this case, civil disobedience as a form of resistance to the denial of rights must be defended, but it must be defended, a time that the laws must attend to the will of the people.
Faustus uses language that creates images of.<u> A. beauty and desire</u><span>
Select all that apply</span>
