The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who were suspended from school for wearing black armbands
to protest the Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students' right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the students. Which of these arguments is most likely to have influenced the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school? A. The Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression. B. Only some of the students at the school were wearing armbands. C. The school allowed students to wear other controversial symbols. D. There is a precedent for schools limiting First Amendment freedom of expression.
The argument that is most likely to have influenced the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school is A. The Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
<h3>What are Human Rights?</h3>
This refers to the fundamental rights of a person that is protected by law to make his own choices.
Hence, we can see that based on the original decision by the lower courts, they said the school was right to suspend the students, but the main argument that overturned this decision is that fact that the Constitution protects individuals' right to freedom of expression
