Answer:
Alexander was “great” because he easily conquered a lot of land and established prominent societies, like Alexandria.
Alexander wasn’t “great” because he was egotistical in naming a city after him and conquering land just for greed.
Alexander was “great” because he was smart enough to cross the river and use Porus’ own elephants against him.
Alexander was not “great” because he tricked a ruler and killed many men in war only because he was greedy and wanted more land.
Alexander was most likely very religious, and it seems that in Ancient Greek anyone seeking refuge in a temple should be shown mercy. Also, if Alexander had killed everyone in the city than there would have been no point in conquering the city except for land.
<span>The answer is A. It seemed to underscore basic weaknesses in the American educational system. When Soviet satellites were discovered, there was a sense of fear in Americans and a sense of motivation to move forward and excel to a higher level in this regard than the Soviets.</span>
Huge decline in poverty and crime is not a characteristic of the cities in 1800.
<u>Explanation</u>:
During 1800, the cities in United States face increase in poverty and crime. Immigrants came to US due crop failure, land and job shortages, rising taxes and scarcity.
Crop lien system is the biggest problem faced by the farmers in the year of 1800. Farm aid was not formed to solve the problems of farmer.
Immigrants in America were paid low at their new jobs, this lead them to live in poverty. Poverty made individuals to commit theft, robbery and other violent acts.
A Glacier is a sheet of ice that moves slowly over land.
John Winthrop helped changed the Government of Massachusetts with moderation. Massachusetts was a very conservative and religious colony at the time. But he was popular because he governed with "modern sensibilities." He fought against very conservative figures as well as very liberal figures in the colony.
