1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lostsunrise [7]
2 years ago
6

Compare the Han Dynasty with the Tang Dynasty. In what ways were the economic, political and social structures the same and in w

hat ways were they different?
History
1 answer:
amm18122 years ago
6 0
<h2>This is a walk-through (Notice !)</h2>

These two dynasties were often compared for their similarities, so this answer is somewhat directed at their differences.

As you go through, you would realize that many of these were in fact closely or loosely related to the political philosophy of Tang.

<h2>Imperial examination</h2>

This procedure of formal selection proceeded through various stages. A "nomination and inspection system" was imposed by the Han Dynasty. It required local leaders to recommend respectable persons for government jobs. This worked "when it worked," but it failed because the structure allowed for nepotism and cronyism. Nominees frequently lacked the necessary skills for the role. The Sui Dynasty proposed the Imperial Examination. It was greatly enlarged upon during the Tang Dynasty. It assessed the examinees' knowledge and talents, regardless of their family rank or connections. Li Shimin, Emperor Taizong, famously declared, <em>"All talented individuals in the world are now within my reach."</em>

Future Emperors and Dynasties proceeded to strengthen the system, including redaction of the examinee's identity during grading, an imperial interview with the Emperor himself at the end, and extremely harsh penalty for cheating examiners and examinees. It was not only an efficient method for selecting officials, but it also stressed the importance of education. As a result, throughout the following thousand years (and until now! ), "best test score" was part of "the Great Chinese Dream." In literature, it was a typical rags-to-riches story technique.

<h3>Restricting the power of prominent clans</h3>

In the Han Dynasty, many clans eventually became very powerful. Notice how in <em>Three Kingdoms</em>, Yuan Shao and Yuan Shu always bragged about their clan? The Sima family was also a powerful clan and this trait persisted in their Jin Dynasty, and even the Southern-Northern Dynasty.

In a period of civil conflict, even Emperors had to seek help from local clans. At best, powerful clans may influence government decisions; at worst, they could amass enormous regional control. The governing class was also descended from prominent clans, such as the Yuwen (Xianbei Zhou Dynasty), Yang (Sui Dynasty), and Li clans. However, in order to avoid any threat to their rule, the Tang Dynasty suppressed localism to the greatest extent possible. Empress Wu Zetian despised it in particular, and her draconic authority diminished its power even further.

As I previously stated, one such option was the formation of a bureaucratic system tied to meritocracy. The Imperial Examination was used to choose local governors, magistrates, and administrators. Local clans with clout no longer propose candidates who are linked with them. This enabled the central authority to divide their region into provinces and administer power more efficiently.

During the Song Dynasty, most powerful clans were just "wealthy," not powerful. They've largely withdrawn from politics.

<h3>No regional prince-lords</h3>

During the early years of the Han Dynasty, numerous members of the Liu family held Lordships in various places. The Tang Dynasty, on the other hand, did not, presumably due to the familial rivalry that existed at the time of its establishment. Li Shimin was once considered to be given lordship of Luoyang as prince (which potentially could’ve split the newly found Tang into two), but his brother (crown prince) Li Jiancheng refused. And then the Xuanwu Gate incident happened where Li Shimin killed his brothers to eventually take the crown himself.

The promotion of various princes to Lords of various regions, as history had shown, was always a recipe for disaster. The Han Dynasty had the Seven Kingdom Rebellion, and the future Ming Dynasty had the civil war between Emperor Jianwen and Yongle. This again gave more power to the regional officials to have full control over their administrative region, but this policy also went to a new extreme after many generations to give rise to An Lushan (a story for another day). Warlord-ism became a significant threat that the Tang Dynasty never really could solve and eventually caused its downfall.

You might be interested in
What are four differences about Sparta and Athens
ivolga24 [154]

Sparta was ruled by two kings, who ruled until they died or were forced out of office. Athens was ruled by archons, who were elected annually. Thus, because both parts of Athens' government had leaders who were elected, Athens is said to have been the birthplace of democracy. Spartan life was simple.

3 0
3 years ago
Development country
Roman55 [17]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

China is considered an highly developed country. In terms of nominal GDP, China comes at the second position in the world. It has a second-largest economy in  the world. China is among the world's largest exporter of goods and stands as a second-largest importer of goods.

Therefore, China is considered a very high development country. Thus option D is correct.

8 0
2 years ago
What leads the author to conclude that the<br> Soviet Union can only be known as a police<br> state?
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer: the Soviet government has very strict and oppressive control over the people.

8 0
3 years ago
Help me with this history question!!
skelet666 [1.2K]

It says "based on the answers above" it depends on all the answers that you put in

8 0
3 years ago
To what extend did the republic recover after 1923 under stressmann
MrRa [10]

Answer:

Stresemann was a politician of the Weimar republic after Ebert. When Stresemann came into power, Germany was still under the influence of the effects of the treaty of Versailles. Germany was in economic peril, owing 6600 million pounds to the victors of the First World War, militarily crippled as the armed forces were reduced to only 100,000 men and no battleships, no armored vehicles and no aircraft or submarines as well as no troops in the Rhineland. The war guilt clause, article 231, also left Germany hating the allies and the treaty of Versailles as they thought it was unfair. Stresemann entered Germany when it was in a state of peril, however, one could argue that his successes outweighed his limitations and he was very significant in the recovery of Germany after 1923 until his death in 1929.

hope this helps

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was a cause of world war 2 in Europe? A. Attack on Pearl Harbor B. Death of Archduke Franz Ferdinand C. Failure of tready
    7·1 answer
  • Our teacher is going to give us presents passive​
    8·2 answers
  • How does the supremacy clause of the us constitution affect the states apex?
    15·2 answers
  • Which helps in the asexual reproduction of yeast?
    5·2 answers
  • What was the primary effect of the War Powers Act Question 15 options: gave the president of the US exclusive power to declare w
    10·2 answers
  • Why couldn't the pilgrims attract more settlers?
    6·2 answers
  • The colonist were outraged after the Townshend Revenue Act, which raised the price of tea. Why were the not pacified by the disc
    12·1 answer
  • Help me please and thank youuuuuu
    8·2 answers
  • D<br> What is the value of<br> -<br> ? Explain your reasoning.<br> C
    11·1 answer
  • What is true about details of setting and plot in historical fiction?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!