1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady_Fox [76]
3 years ago
7

When a public school district holds a hearing for the same offense for which public courts have already prosecuted a student it

is
O legal
O double jeopardy
O illegal
O violation of due process
Law
1 answer:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
4 0

When a public school district holds a hearing for the same offense for which public courts have already prosecuted a student it is double jeopardy.

<h3>What is double jeopardy?</h3>

Double jeopardy can  be defined as the process of holding a second hearing for the same offence a person committed after the first hearing has been hold.

Based on the given scenario the act committed by the school is known as  Double jeopardy because the courts has already prosecuted the person and the school went ahead to still prosecute the person for the same offence.

Therefore the correct option is B.

Learn more about Double jeopardy here:brainly.com/question/14406693

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
El conjunto de las magnitudes y sus unidades de medida forman un?​
tino4ka555 [31]

Answer:

Ojo de masa

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What should you do at an
Marysya12 [62]
Cautiously continue driving
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Some scholars have argued that the parole system should be abolished. Do you agree or
DiKsa [7]

No according to me the parole system should not be abolished but it should be more strict and done in more specific platforms cases.

Explanation:

According to my opinion, the parole should not be abolished but it should be categorized for some specific cases. The court system needs to define or create a category in which some specific or certain cases fall.

On the basis of nature of case, the court need to grant parole such as in theft cases while in cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping which are more dangerous in nature, should not grant parole.

Thus specification is a required amendment rather than abolishing.  

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is a nationalist
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

a person who strongly identifies with their own nation and vigorously supports its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following BEST completes the blank line in diagram above?
azamat
The answer I’m leaning towards is building strong communities considering the other answers are vague and not specific like orangish events
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What state court are courts of record ?
    14·1 answer
  • Help please?
    15·1 answer
  • Children who are born in the US don't have to worry about their undocumented parents being deported because when an undocumented
    15·1 answer
  • What is the main duty of the Supreme Court
    12·1 answer
  • Which service handled by local government is an example of the concept of service-by-size?
    7·2 answers
  • Choose all the statements about the common law that are CORRECT.
    12·2 answers
  • Do you think that media coverage of crime makes us more afraid of crime? Should there be regulations on the crime/violence shown
    11·1 answer
  • 20 points!!!
    7·1 answer
  • A steady green traffic light means _____.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements describes a general perspective of Latino parents?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!