No according to me the parole system should not be abolished but it should be more strict and done in more specific platforms cases.
Explanation:
According to my opinion, the parole should not be abolished but it should be categorized for some specific cases. The court system needs to define or create a category in which some specific or certain cases fall.
On the basis of nature of case, the court need to grant parole such as in theft cases while in cases like murder, attempt to murder, kidnapping which are more dangerous in nature, should not grant parole.
Thus specification is a required amendment rather than abolishing.
A parole system is when a prisoner serving a jail sentence is released before the due date and then monitored closely by his/her parole officer. The parole officer ensures he’s well integrated back into the society and doesn’t go back to his past crime history.
Some prisoners are victim of circumstances or convicted wrongly.
It shouldn’t be abolished because majority of people after serving prison sentences are usually truly repentant and make good use of this ‘second chance’ privilege to make things right about their lives.
Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more. Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.
An autocracy is a government in which one person has all the power. There are two main types of autocracy: a monarchy and a dictatorship. In a monarchy, a king or queen rules the country. The king or queen is known as a monarch.
Federal Judges are appointed for life because that is how it was written into the US Constitution. ... The writers of the Constitution gave federal judges job security because they wanted judges to be able to decide cases free from public or political pressures.
