1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karolina [17]
2 years ago
13

According to the Supreme Court in Muller v.

History
1 answer:
Helen [10]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In their trading relationship Kush relied on Egypt for ____ and traded for _____
Lelechka [254]

Answer:

C. Grain

A. Gold

Explanation:

Egypt and Kush had close ties, and they had lot of trade going on between them. Lot of products were traded between these two civilizations, but the main focus was around the grain and gold. Egypt highly valued the gold, but it didn't had its own reserves of it. The Kush lacked food sources, such as grain. Because of this, Egypt provided Kush with grain that it had in abundance, while Kush provided Egypt with gold which it had abundance, so both sides benefited from it.

6 0
3 years ago
This painting appears three-dimensional as a result of Raphael's use of
Furkat [3]

The correct answer is linear perspective

Linear perspective is the method that represents the three dimensions of space on a flat surface. It is a geometric system that creates the illusion of depth. Knowing that parallel lines are always on the horizon, perspective mimics the depth of the painting.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the barons turn against de Montfort?
Olegator [25]

The Second Barons' War (1264–1267) was a civil war in England between the forces of a number of barons led by Simon de Montfort against the royalist forces of King Henry III, led initially by the king himself and later by his son, the future King Edward I. The barons sought to force the king to rule with a council of barons rather than through his favourites.

3 0
3 years ago
Why miller felt the allegory was necessary?
ruslelena [56]
<span>Miller was particularly offended by those who "named names" before HUAC, and he himself refused to do so. While the Crucible indeed villainized the prosecutors and Court – those in the parallel positions of Joe McCarthy and HUAC – the play martyrs Corey and Proctor for refusing to do so. At the expense of their own lives, Corey and Proctor refused to condemn others, and in Miller's eyes, this is the only truly moral decision.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
History of the Holocaust
djverab [1.8K]
They committee suicide before the end of the war
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In ancient rome, which type of assembly could declare war?
    15·1 answer
  • Why does a historian have to understand what point of view is?
    6·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!!!<br><br> How did Gutenberg’s printing press influence literacy and scholarship
    5·1 answer
  • What did woman have to do with World War Two
    11·1 answer
  • Framers of the 1876 texas constitution adopted a plural executive system in order to ________.
    14·1 answer
  • All of the following statements are true about the reign of Peter the Great of Russia EXCEPT Group of answer choices A) Westerni
    6·2 answers
  • Click there picccccc​
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you think each party had different views toward the Alien and Sedition Acts
    12·1 answer
  • Civilization
    15·1 answer
  • By definition is the United States a capitalistic country? Explain.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!