According to the Supreme Court in Muller v.

Why do historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry?

Anastasy [175]

Answer:

Historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry because they give a true picture of the political environment in that particular time period. ... Such cartoons are drawn by knowledgeable people who understand the public mindset very well.

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did Galileo Galileo contribute to modern science?

OLga [1]

yes, he is right the answer is,

Galileo's most important scientific contributions were in the field of physics. ... Using the telescope, Galileo discovered the mountains on the moon, the spots on the sun, and four moons of Jupiter. His discoveries provided the evidence to support the theory that the earth and other planets revolved around the sun.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is one of the key indicators of primates' adaptability?

boyakko [2]

It's interesting that you posted your question in the history section of Brainly. It qualifies in the category of "Big History," as some have termed it. That term was coined by the scholar David Christian, whom I met once at a conference where he was a presenter. His idea was that we look at "history" not just as what has happened in the recorded records of human beings, but look back at all that has occurred in the history of the universe. So the "Big History" concept incorporates the story of evolution into its account of things.

As far as your specific question, a key indicator of primates' adaptability is that you see primates living in all sorts of different regions on the planet. Snow monkeys live in cold regions of Japan where snow covers the ground many months of the year. Howler monkeys live in the tropical rainforests of Brazil. And there are other primates of all sorts in all sorts of climates and conditions. That shows the adaptability of primates to survive and thrive in various circumstances.

4 0

3 years ago

Should the government have the authority to limit our freedom

Phantasy [73]

Answer:

Depends on the government type

Explanation:

In democracy, in theory, are the citizens to "choose" the government so should be easy to forcast whether or not the the government will take a decision. Freedom is a very broad concept (movement,speech, writing, advertising...). Unless you are in jail something that you consider freedom could be not for others.

8 0

3 years ago

Please help History questions.

zimovet [89]

Answer:

The two themes I choose:

- Separation of Powers

The "Separation of Powers" states that governmental powers are to be evenly split between "x" amount of branches, x being determined by the Founding Fathers. Each of these branches are given a certain power (or job) that they need to do. For example, The Powers were separated and given to 3 branches:

Executive Branch: This branch is has the power to create a bill, as well as veto, line-veto, give ideas on what to change in a bill, create diplomatic relations with countries, ask congress to start wars, set up Judicial Judges.

Legislative Branch: This branch has the power to create bills, pass the bill, declare war, regulate commerce, control taxation and spending policies, veto or approve Judicial Judges.

Judicial Branch: This branch has the power to impeach Presidents, declare a law or bill as unconstitutional, have the last word on cases that reaches the Supreme Court.

- Checks and Balances

As stated above, there are 3 branches. Each of these branches (I will reiterate what i said) have the powers over the other, so as to not be able to overstep their bounds. Think of it as a triangle, in which they have more power and less power than the others.

Executive Branch:

Powers:

Veto/Pass Bills

Instate Judges

Start relations with other countries

Weakness:

Can be impeached

Veto can be overturned by Congress; Bills passed can be overturned by the Supreme Court

Must ask Congress to start wars if relations turn sour

Legislative Branch:

Powers:

Able to pass laws

Able to declare war

Able to regulate country and foreign commerce

Able to control taxes and how the government spends its funds

Weakness:

Congressmen & women can be replaced

Laws passed can be vetoed/declared unconstitutional

Judicial Branch:

Powers:

Life long term if appointed unless... (which would be put in weakness)

Able to declare laws unconstitutional

Able to have final word in how laws would be interpreted

Weaknesses:

Judges can be replaced

Rulings can be changed if the law is changed later on

4 0

3 years ago