Answer:
unequal distribution of wealth
divine right of the monarch was perceived to be too arbitrary.
corruption
increase in the tax
Explanation:
The French Revolution which lasted from 1787 to 1799 had several factors that contributed to its cause. One of the major causes was the unequal distribution of wealth between the bourgeois and poor people.
The divine right of the monarch was perceived to be too arbitrary. Intellectuals and enlightenment advocates started to criticize such right. In time, more people started to join the enlightenment movement.
The rise in corruption among the royal family and nobles and increase in the tax both contributed immensely to the cause. Apart from these causes, French involvement in the American Revolution, bankruptcy and economic failure all attributed to the rise of the revolution.
Answer:
It is not about plantations or being racits for may it was about not ceceding to Nationalism. Many Southernist believed in an idealism known as sectionalism. This meant that they believed that they wanted the state government to have more power than the national government. Many also believed that the industrial growth that the North wanted to persue was not the best option, because many in the South wanted to continue the economy on another path through farming.
Explanation:
The Coercive acts or intorable acts were passed by the Britishers as a way to stop people from plotting against the Crown. Option B is correct.
<h3>What are Coercive acts?</h3>
The Intolerable Acts or Coercive Acts of 1774 had been a sequence of punitive legal guidelines exceeded with the aid of using the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party.
The legal guidelines aimed to punish Massachusetts colonists for his or her defiance withinside the Tea Party protest of the Tea Act, a tax degree enacted with the aid of using Parliament in May 1773.
Thus, The Coercive acts or intorable acts were passed by the Britishers as a way to stop people from plotting against the Crown. Option B is correct.
learn more about Intolerable Acts:
brainly.com/question/5956228
#SPJ1
I believe the answer is: Originally meeting as a large group, as the House of Commons was instated, the clergy and nobles became the House of Lords
During the meeting, the members of the house of commons would be the one that analyze a certain legislation and determine whether the legislation is eligible for passing or not. The house of lords than would gather together to review the decision made by members of the house of commons.
Answer:
The phrase is referring to the power struggle going on between the President and the Congress. If the conflict is not resolved it might come down to the voters.
Explanation:
The way the government works is by a system of checks and balances. This means that power is divided into three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. This system allows each branch to keep the others in check. Clashed and power struggles between the branches is not something new, but the recent issues are really putting the system to the test.
Currently the system is in crisis because the Trump administration is at odds with Congress. There are several alternatives for the situation to be resolved, but some, like John Fortier, suggest that it should be decided by the voters. That's why he says, "The people can speak. The people can decide if the President is right or Congress is right."
