1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikdorinn [45]
3 years ago
15

The fact that there was no national military was a weakness in which area of government

Social Studies
2 answers:
Paraphin [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer on Edgen. is


C. administrative

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]3 years ago
3 0

The fact that there was no national military under the Articles of Confederation was a weaknesses in the administrative part of the government.

Further Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was America's first constitution free from British rule. This system of government gave very littler power to the federal government while giving significant power to state governments. One of the reasons behind this was due to America's experience as British colonists and their terrible experience with an overbearing central government.

With this in mind, the Articles of Confederation barely gave the federal government any power. The Articles of Confederation did not allow the federal government to collect taxes or raise an army. This caused significant problems, especially when it came to the governments inability to put down Shay's Rebellion.

Ultimately, the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation lead the delegates at the Constitutional Convention to get rid of this constitution and replace it with the US Constitution we still use today.

Learn More:

Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation- brainly.com/question/3371679  

Key Details:

Topic: American History, Constitutional History

Grade Level: 9-12

Keywords: Articles of Confederation, US Constitution, Constitutional Convention

You might be interested in
The labeling theory was a method used in the late 1800s to identify criminals by tattooing a symbol on their left hand. true or
timurjin [86]

The labelling theory was a method used in the late 1800s to identify criminals by tattooing a symbol on their left hand, is the false statement.

<h3>What is The labelling theory?</h3>

A school of thought in the sociology of deviance called "labelling theory" focuses on how social control agents link stigmatizing stereotypes to certain groups and how people who have been stigmatized change their behaviour as a result.

The key statement on labelling is from Howard Becker "People identify certain behaviours as being deviant. Deviancy is not a quality of the act a person undertakes, but rather a result of the imposition of rules and sanctions by others on a "offender."

Thus, it is a false statement.

For more details about  labelling theory, click here:

brainly.com/question/11667184

#SPJ1

5 0
1 year ago
Until 1991, Communism was the form of government in the Soviet Union. What are several facts about life in the Soviet Union?
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

the correct answer is 1 2 4 5

Explanation:

hope this helped

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
28. One difference between the House and Senate is the number of members. Because of this, which of the following is true?
Alchen [17]

As a result of the relatively immense size of the House of Representatives,<u> e. A </u><u>greater number </u><u>of formal </u><u>rules </u><u>are needed to </u><u>govern </u><u>activity in the </u><u>House</u><u>.</u>

The U.S. Congress:

  • Comprises of 435 members in the House of Representatives
  • Comprises of 100 members in the Senate

With the House of Representatives being more than 4 times the size of the Senate, more rules are needed to manage the House because it is an indisputable fact that more people create more opportunity for carnage and so this must be managed more.

In conclusion, there are more rules in the House due to its size.

<em>Find out more differences between the </em><em>Senate </em><em>and </em><em>House </em><em>at brainly.com/question/2605612.</em>

5 0
2 years ago
Why does a hypothesis have to be falsifiable
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

A hypothesis or model is called falsifiable if it is possible to conceive of an experimental observation that disproves the idea in question. That is, one of the possible outcomes of the designed experiment must be an answer, that if obtained, would disprove the hypothesis.

6 0
4 years ago
On which issues did Clinton and Republican<br> Congress disagree?
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

Federal Budget

Balanced Budget Amendment

Explanation:

Hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a monomyth?
    13·2 answers
  • During the Civil War, the Confederacy had a major advantage over the Union in which of these areas?
    11·2 answers
  • Why some americans opposed to taking control of the philippines?
    9·1 answer
  • What is teaching job​
    12·2 answers
  • Randy wants to become a professional musician. He is already very proficient on the guitar and violin. Which brain structure all
    11·1 answer
  • Q6. Amida recognizes that there are limitations to her proposed research study that explores students’ opinions about campus men
    8·1 answer
  • Two characteristics of each of the three types of rocks
    12·1 answer
  • What are the reasons for the high unemployment of highly qualified young people?
    14·2 answers
  • Comparison between the traditional art of UAE and African
    7·1 answer
  • (Pls help!!!) match these
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!