How did World War II change the global balance of power?

In what way does the European Union affect the rest of the world?

Aloiza [94]

"<span>It improves trade between different parts of the world" is the best answer, since the joining of all the nations in the EU has been trade easier for a variety of countries. </span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following was not a way pioneers could get information about the Oregon trail?

Setler79 [48]

Guid books because they didn't have anyone to hand them the books and also people don't waste their time on books they are out there for gold

8 0

2 years ago

(PLEASE HELP QUICK!!)

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:/Explanation

The term "Green Revolution" otherwise referred to as the Agricultural revolution was an era of a global massive agricultural boom during the 1950s and 1960s. The boom was triggered mainly by the introduction of innovative agricultural technologies in farming. Agricultural production within this period was at its peak, technologies like high-yielding or hybrid seeds were planted; mechanized irrigation and application of fertilizer and pesticides were also adopted; technology-driven food production, processing and storage facilities, and infrastructures were also developed to aid and enhance global agricultural productivity. The green revolution era was of immense benefit to developing nations, especially in Africa, and other Third World nations.

Some of the intended outcomes of the Green Revolution include:

1. Food Security: Green Revolution aided the attainment of average global food security. Food was more readily available and accessible. The initiative was able to prevent massive death and diseases which could have resulted from starvation and malnutrition.

2. Environmental Impact: The employment of safe technological innovation in agricultural production helped to reduce greenhouse gases emission, and thus curb the effect of climate change and global warming.

Some of the unintended outcomes include:

1. Introduction of new diseases and increase in mortality rate: The application of highly concentrated fertilizers to increase agricultural production and the use of high acidic pesticides to control pests had a negative effect on human health, in that humans end up consuming these chemicals which are absorbed by the plants, and this resulted in the growth of cancer disease in humans, and consequently, increase in mortality rate. The Punjab case in India is a classical example of the negative effect of the green revolution.

2. Population Growth: One other unintended outcome of the green revolution was that it encouraged population growth with the belief that there will be enough food to feed the growing world population. This was the biggest concern of Malthusian Theory, which posits that increase food production encourages increase population and that if the population growth is not controlled it will get to a point where the quantity of food produced won't be enough to meet the dietary needs of the world population, and consequently, the world will be plunged in famine.

6 0

3 years ago

Compare and Contrast How were slash-and-burn agriculture and

lesya692 [45]

Answer:

slash-and-burn agriculture and chinampas

Explanation:

The Aztec lived in wet areas. For farming, they used the chinampas to grow crops like corn, beans and squash. Chinampas were man-made islands, raised land on the surface of lake shallow waters. Chinampas were made of soil and rotten vegetation and dirt from nearby areas which allowed the crops to grow fast.

The Maya used the Slash and Burn method to farm. They would cut down all the trees and burned the stumps to clear the land for farming. The burning of vegetation provided fertile soil from the ashes. The Maya grew the same crops as the Aztec.

Both the Empire use different methods of farming to crow crops. They both rely on farming for crops. They both grow the same crops like corn, beans and Squash which also known as the three sisters as planted together.

7 0

3 years ago

NEED TO BE ANSWERED ASAP!!! WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST IF IT IS ANSWERED CORRECTLY

ale4655 [162]

Answer:

The bombing of Hiroshima is and Nagaski is one of the most important events in history. Due to the fact that this affected and still is affecting human kind in Hiroshima and Nagaski. This all occurred because of Hiroshimas military and to the intend to make Japan surrender, in cause to end World War ll, they later decided to bomb Nagaski too. Over 200,000 died and thousands more were hurt in this tragity, but some surviors live to tell the story of this historic moment. Two of those surviors were Sunao Tsuboi and Shigemitsu Tanaka, victims of the Hiroshima and Nagaski bombing on August 6, 1945 and August 9, of 1945.

While Sunao Tsuboi was a 20 year old man heading to collage in Hiroshima when this occurred, he was buned from head to toe he stated in NYTimes.com. He knew at this moment it would be the end for him, he layed next to a bridge. Until a classmate found and approched him, he took him to a military hsopital where he got medical help. Till this day he is a retired worker, with a wife, children, and grandchildern. He has worked in office for the President and urged and stated this to the president to "work for world peace after he leave office".

Shigemitsu Tanaka, was almost five when he witness this tragity. He discribed everything as white, windows braking, and a huge thunderclap in the sky. He was only playing under a tree when he took cover and tried to protect himself. Later his mother suffered from repeated illnesses she worked as an elementary instructor. His father later died from cancer after 12 years of the bombing. Tanka said he "smelled burning flesh and moans", he also stated that Obama should clear nuclear wepons for good and hoped he would sit and listen to survivors.

I would not defend nor support this tragity due to the fact that many innocent people were hurt or killed. In my opionion I think the United States should have used a diffrerent strategy to the point where no human being should have been hurt. Sometimes I do not understand why the United States didn't take percuation in this situation for the people. They always use the moto "For the good of the people" but did not lead up to this at the end. So in conculsion I DO NOT support or defend the bombing of Hiroshima or Nagaski.

WRBSITES:https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.html

Hope this somewhat helps you out, make sure to check for spelling errors many typos.

websites: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/28/world/asia/survivors-recount-horrors-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki.htmlExplanation:

6 0

3 years ago