Answer: Inaccurate observation
Explanation:
Altruistic behavior is the attitude and act of people that show selfless care and good will a person has for other people in terms of supporting them,proving care or help.
According to the question,observer has generated the error of inaccurate observation as she did not precisely noted and noticed the people who actually assisted the man.Thus, she gave incorrect report of seven helping people rather than five people.
2. The geologic time scale (GTS) is a system of chronological dating that relates geological strata (stratigraphy) to time. It is used by geologists, paleontologists, and other Earth scientists to describe the timing and relationships of events that have occurred during Earth's history.
3. the answer is B
4. The ones furthest from the surface
5. The answer is D
Happy to help, Your welcome. Good luck on getting a good grade on the assignment.
Answer:
Double denial results in a statement. In logic when you use a doble denial, it results as an afirmation.
Original sentence: <u>I have nothing.</u>
Negated sentence: <u>I don´t have nothing.</u>
Explanation:
In this sentece the word nothing helps us make the same sense in both sentences. I have nothing has the same meaning as the sentence: I don't have nothing. Both sentences mean the same but one of the has a denial.
Not having nothing is the same thing as having nothing.
Answer:
This best illustrates the process of discrimination.
Explanation:
Discrimination is a term used in Psychology in which the individual is able to <em>distinguish between different stimulus</em>, even if they are relatively similar.
In this case, Miguel is carrying out the process of discrimination since he <em>does not generalize his fear to all dogs</em> but only to the one who bit him. He is able to distinguish between all the dogs (stimulus).
Answer:
unconstitutional because of its excessive approach.
Explanation:
As you may already know, all US states are subject to federal laws, which must be obeyed throughout the United States. However, all states in the country have the autonomy to formulate their own legislation that will be valid for the entire territory of the state, as long as it does not go against any federal law. There is a federal regulation that states that it is not allowed to hinder or prevent interstate commerce. From this we can state that the statute created and approved by the state of Vermont, which prohibits the sale of any maple syrup not produced in Vermont, is unconstitutional.
This statute is unconstitutional because, in addition to having an excessive approach, it goes against a federal norm.
