1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kruka [31]
2 years ago
8

What did Corrie mean when she observed that "life in Ravensbruck took place on two separate levels"?

English
1 answer:
Volgvan2 years ago
5 0

The inference is that the meaning when Corrie observed that "life in Ravensbruck took place on two separate levels" is that women at Ravensbruck are spiritual and observable.

<h3>What is an inference?</h3>

An inference simply means the conclusion that can be deduced based on the information given in a literary work.

In this case, the inference is that the meaning when Corrie observed that "life in Ravensbruck took place on two separate levels" is that women at Ravensbruck are spiritual and observable.

Learn more about inference on:

brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
How would one take advantage in having power?​
tekilochka [14]

Answer:

One can take advantage of a power if they are selfish

Explanation:

If you are asking how someone can abuse a power in real life, an example would be someone who is famous and using their power as a celebrity to make people hate someone, which is selfish.

In fiction, A super hero can use their powers to make people give them things so they won't get hurt which is another example of selfishness.

If you are talking someone using their power positively, then one can take advantage of their powers by helping others.

4 0
3 years ago
What does the subject of a sentence indicate?
ANEK [815]
The answer is A who or what .
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What/where does the constitution give the president the diplomatic power?
d1i1m1o1n [39]

Answer:

Explanation:

Hamilton, although he had expressed substantially the same view in The Federalist regarding the power of reception, adopted a very different conception of it in defense of Washington’s proclamation. Writing under the pseudonym, “Pacificus,” he said: “The right of the executive to receive ambassadors and other public ministers, may serve to illustrate the relative duties of the executive and legislative departments. This right includes that of judging, in the case of a revolution of government in a foreign country, whether the new rulers are competent organs of the national will, and ought to be recognized, or not; which, where a treaty antecedently exists between the United States and such nation, involves the power of continuing or suspending its operation. For until the new government is acknowledged, the treaties between the nations, so far at least as regards public rights, are of course suspended. This power of determining virtually upon the operation of national treaties, as a consequence of the power to receive public ministers, is an important instance of the right of the executive, to decide upon the obligations of the country with regard to foreign nations. To apply it to the case of France, if there had been a treaty of alliance, offensive and defensive, between the United States and that country, the unqualified acknowledgment of the new government would have put the United States in a condition to become as an associate in the war with France, and would have laid the legislature under an obligation, if required, and there was otherwise no valid excuse, of exercising its power of declaring war. This serves as an example of the right of the executive, in certain cases, to determine the condition of the nation, though it may, in its consequences, affect the exercise of the power of the legislature to declare war. Nevertheless, the executive cannot thereby control the exercise of that power. The legislature is still free to perform its duties, according to its own sense of them; though the executive, in the exercise of its constitutional powers, may establish an antecedent state of things, which ought to weigh in the legislative decision. The division of the executive power in the Constitution, creates a concurrent authority in the cases to which it relates.

3 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes how Douglass uses hypophora in this excerpt?
s2008m [1.1K]
D is the right answer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the information the author includes about successful change in the past, what can you conclude the speaker believes abo
9966 [12]
You can conclude that the speaker Believes that climate change is a serious manner that needs to be addressed immediately with effective measures to insure the best outcome for planet earth and mankind itself.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • (500-750 Words) Write a short story inspired by the unit theme, injustice. Model your narrative after one of the selections in t
    12·2 answers
  • Select the correct passage.
    5·1 answer
  • Prospero is first seen in an island hut. Question 1 options: 1) True 2) False
    11·1 answer
  • In paragraph 9, readers can conclude that crop prices fell and land prices rose because
    10·2 answers
  • What's the answer to this ?
    8·1 answer
  • How can historical information prepare you to study Shakespeare? <br><br>'-'
    6·1 answer
  • The lizard was so lethargic that I wasn’t sure if it was alive or dead it did not even blink
    6·1 answer
  • What did the audiences of the two speeches given by FDR after the attack on
    7·1 answer
  • What is the author Shirley Jacksons message about traditions in The Lottery by Shirley Jackson
    6·1 answer
  • Identify the error in the following sentence and the best way to fix it.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!