All categories

2 years ago

What was the key difference between the consequences faced by the United States and the Soviet Union after the Cold War?

History

2 answers:

Dahasolnce [82]2 years ago

6 0

C because I’m smart have a good day

Hoochie [10]2 years ago

6 0

Out of process of elimination option D is the valid option. Indeed the United States did improve its global standing it had on the world after the end of world war 2 with the creation of NATO and its overseas Allie’s around the world. The Soviet Union in fact did face economic and political ruin after world war 2 due to the fact almost all of the Soviet union’s European land was attacked by Germany and its Allie’s during operation Barbarossa and many industrial sites and factories were destroyed.

You might be interested in

What effects of de Soto's expedition does this passage

PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

I took the test

5 0

3 years ago

When did the first americans arrive in north america??

Zolol [24]

The first people to arrive in America were Native Americans. They arrived about 13,000 years ago. However the first colonists arrived around 1607.

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following statements about Worcester v Georgia is true?

Nat2105 [25]

Answer:

i think b

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

What do OSHA and the SEC have in common?

Harlamova29_29 [7]

What is common between OSHA and SEC is : ( C ) Both create and enforce regulations

<h3>Functions of OSHA and SEC </h3>

OSHA sets/creates safety working standards which ensures safety working conditions for employees at work, this safety working standards are also enforced by OSHA through training and outreach to employers of labor. While SEC set rules which is aimed at protecting financial investors in an fairly regulated market ( stock market and other forms of financial markets ). and also enforces them.

Hence we can conclude that What is common between OSHA and SEC is : ( C ) Both create and enforce regulations

Learn more about OSHA and SEC : brainly.com/question/11819769

#SPJ1

7 0

2 years ago

What are the negative effects of considering political leanings when selecting Supreme Court Justices?

Snowcat [4.5K]

The negative effects of considering political leanings when selecting Supreme Court Justices include:

The risk of bias
The possibility of selecting an unqualified an inexperienced person

<h3>What are political leanings?</h3>

In the U.S., some people belong to the conservative political group while others belong to the liberal or democratic group.

It is wrong to select a Supreme Court Justice on any of these basis because the emotion is a major player that can lead to the wrong choices.

In such cases, the qualifications of the candidates might be overlooked due to bias.

Learn more about political leanings here:

brainly.com/question/1470181

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago