The essay required by the above question is intended to assess your ability to interpret, write and identify rhetorical appeals in a text. For that reason, I can't write the essay for you, but I'll show you how to write it.
First, it is important that you read the entire text “Tipping System Exacerbates Unfair Pay at Restaurants,” understanding the arguments raised by the author and the message that the text is intended to promote.
In this reading, you should analyze how rhetorical appeals were established and developed by the author.
Rhetorical appeals are presented in an essay to convince readers about something. These rhetorical appeals are called ethos, pathos and logos. You can identify them as follows:
- Ethos: It tries to convince authors through ethical and moral concepts, showing the good and bad elements in a society and dictating how individuals should act in a correct, fair and positive way.
- Pathos: Try to convince readers through sentimentality, showing elements that move the reader and stimulate their emotions.
- Logos: Try to convince the reader through logical elements, where the reader must stimulate reasoning, interpretation and thinking.
Once you have identified the rhetorical appeals, you can write the essay as follows:
- Introduction: Present the article you reviewed, the author and the main subject of this article.
- Body: Write two paragraphs showing how rhetorical appeals are used in this article and what the author's purposes are in using them.
- Conclusion: Show how effective the use of these appeals is and how important they are in the text.
You can get more information at the link below:
brainly.com/question/11606608?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
D. Governments must join people in fighting for a sustainable climate.
Explanation:
In his Nobel Prize Speech, Gore compares the inaction displayed by world leaders against Hitler, to the inaction displayed by world leaders against climate change. Also I took the test. Have a nice day :)
Answer:
b. He got what was coming to him!
Answer: PART B: Which TWO of the following quotes best support the answer to Part A? A. “Nicholas II, by contrast, was one of history’s most dismal examples of the wrong man, at the wrong time, and in the wrong place. His reign seemed to be almost predetermined to end in a momentous tragedy.” (Paragraph 6) B. “They had ruled Russia for more than 280 years, and most of their subjects—as the czar’s German-born wife, Alexandra, wrote to British Queen Victoria —practically worshipped them “as divine beings.” (Paragraph 9) C. “What the last Romanov did not have was an understanding and respect for the dirt-poor and frequently hungry peasants who eked out a meager living, and it was part of Nicholas’ misfortune that his abysmal insensitivity and weakness were revealed on the very day after his coronation.” (Paragraph 12) D. “In February 1904—less than four months later—Japan launched a surprise attack that destroyed a Russian fleet and threatened to seize Port Arthur, Russia’s only warm-water port. In the war that followed, the Japanese army decisively won every battle…” (Paragraph 24) E. “Nicholas also showed a puzzling disregard for a major uproar in his own court over the growing influence of a mystical faith healer named Grigori Rasputin.” (Paragraph 27) F. “After the control over the country shifted from a provisional government to Lenin’s radicals (the Bolsheviks), the royal couple, their son and four daughters, and the ex-czar’s personal physician and three servants were moved to a house in Yekaterinburg, a town beyond the Urals.” (Paragraph 30)
