<span>The sentences that are used
to foreshadow Fortunato’s eventual fate is:</span>
He
raised it to his lips with a leer.
"I
drink," he said, "to the buried that repose around us."
"A
huge human foot d'or, in a field azure; the foot crushes a serpent rampant
whose fangs are imbedded in the heel."
Foreshadowing is when the writer gives a hint on what would
happen next in the story and in these sentences, the readers would think
suspiciously of the man who is with Fortunato.
B. Jill identifies the big tasks first.
This is the most logical with cleaning anything, and by process of elimination, D wouldn’t be right because she wouldn’t need advice to clean her own home, A wouldnt be right due to the fact that’s she wants to clean.
Of food is the adjective phrase.
No, Lay testimony is the evidence brought in light by the witness who is not an expert but can testify to interferences and opinions.
Lay opinion testimony is admissible as long as it helps as a factfinder and rationally depends on the personal perceptions. Lay witness’ opinions are often more helpful than the other raw data which form the base of the belief.
Lay opinion testimony refers to evidence given by a witness who is not qualified as an expert but who testifies to opinions or inferences. For example, a testimony showing a person was “angry” or “ excited” is more convincing and understandable compared to a lengthy, physical description of the man’s outward expression.
The law as stated in the book(decree/act) is known the following:
USCS Fed Rules Evid R 701. Opinion Testimony by Lay Witnesses.
Additionally, it is limited to opinions which are rational, helpful and not based on specific knowledge under Rule 702.
