For a benefit to happen it must be a good thing. Like helping others, or participating on something good. <span />
Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
Answer:
B. is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The political system of the United States is a democracy which means rule by the people. The Soviet Union had a totalitarian government which means that the government can control over public and private life in a high degree.
Final Answer: B.
The answer to your question is,
B. secretary of the treasury.
- Mabel <3
Answer:
the anser is a and can you help me
Explanation:
