Read the following passage:

Law

1 answer:

iren [92.7K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Tort.

Explanation:

There are no facts given that would suggest a breach of contract (though with certain facts, that could be the case).

With facts given, this would be a Tort, defined as "a wrongful act or an infringement of a right (other than under contract) leading to civil legal liability."

The former business partner, if the allegations are found true, is in violation of intellectual property laws, theft and possibly other legal theories which may be applicable given additional facts.

There is no discussion of a contract; this is not a criminal offense; and there is no evidence of a prior judgment to be adjudicated.

You might be interested in

FILL IN THE BLANK. Jack violated a condition of his parole. This resulted in parole ________ and he was returned to prison.

vazorg [7]

A - Revocation. If a parolee has been accused of violating the terms of their parole, they may be remanded to the custody of the Department of Correction and the Revocation process with the Board of Pardons and Paroles will begin.

8 0

1 year ago

Plz settle this arguement<br> 0/10 which is the best?

mr_godi [17]

I like the first photo a lot get it girlll

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Most of us paying attention recognize that these Hearings are basically a formality, in that, Republicans will vote for Barrett

Irina-Kira [14]

Answer:

no because she needs to be conformed

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

On 5 August, X sends a written offer by post to Y, to purchase Y’s ROLEX watch for R20000 (twenty thousand rand). One of the ter

notka56 [123]

Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.

This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.

<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>

This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.

Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.

Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.