As the prosecuting attorney, your role is to defend the defendant in regards to the case and even if they had committed a crime, you have to make sure that they are not proven guilty or they are acquitted.
To some extent, the level of crime or crime type matter because some prosecuting attorney will let their clients go if it a petty crime but when it is a crime such as murder, misappropriation of funds, they may never compromise.
<h3>What is this case about?</h3>
If you known that it is a huge crime and your conscience cannot allow you to let the man go so that he will not do it again, you can tell the opposition lawyer anonymously but this may jeopardize your law career if caught.
The right thing to do is to step down from been the prosecuting attorney and then you can be free from that guilt of betrayal to yourself and to the defendant and then one can properly submit the evidence to the opposition lawyer.
Learn more about prosecuting attorney from
brainly.com/question/11589445
#SPJ1
Answer:
Judiciary Act 1801
Explanation:
The judiciary act of 1801 which was overturned by the Jeffersonian republicans were part of the politically-motivated attempt made by the federalists in the U.S congress and the administration of John Adams to fill the federal courts with federalists. Federal courts were used as political means to persecute those who criticized the actions of the federalists and a strong political opposition came into place by Thomas Jefferson, and his team helped in passing the Federal Judiciary act of 1801.
The number of Supreme Court judges was reduced from six to five by the act and the act also created six new federal circuit courts in different region of the United States of America.
Answer:
I. Offer.
II. Acceptance.
III. Legal object.
Explanation:
A contract can be defined as an agreement between two or more parties (group of people) which gives rise to a mutual legal obligation or enforceable by law.
Also, mutual assent is a legal term which represents an agreement by both parties to a contract. When two parties to a contract both have an understanding of the parameters, terms and conditions surrounding a contract, it ultimately implies that they are in agreement; this is generally referred to as mutual assent.
I. In this scenario, Joe Smith is a potential buyer. His real estate agent helps him complete the contract and he signs it. It is delivered to the seller. This is an example of an offer.
An offer simply depicts the willingness of a party to contract based on certain terms and conditions which shall become binding on the other party to the contract as soon as he or she consents.
II. In this scenario, Joe Smith is a potential buyer. His real estate agent helps him complete the contract and he signs it. It is delivered to the seller Jane Doe. Jane Doe completes the box that says "Accepted" on page 9 and signs. Thus, this is an example of an acceptance.
An acceptance depicts an agreement to the terms and conditions of a particular thing.
III. In this scenario, Joe Smith and Jane Smith have both signed this contract. Line 33 of the contract ("PRICE") was completed so that it reads One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000). Thus, this provision is an example of a legal object.
A legal object is simply anything that has value and as such gives legal rights to the subject (owner).
Answer:
I believe that someone could argue xenophobia in that case. Because not all people of a nation are going to be bad or want revenge, I think that since he was a decedent that he shouldn't have been penalized Because he never made a threat or showed any signs of danger to anyone.
Explanation:
Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.
<h3>What we know about the burden of proof.</h3>
- In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
- The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
- When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
- You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.
Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.
To learn more about criminal law visit:
brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults
