1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vesna_86 [32]
2 years ago
5

Read the following passage:

Law
1 answer:
iren [92.7K]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Tort.

Explanation:

There are no facts given that would suggest a breach of contract (though with certain facts, that could be the case).  

With facts given, this would be a Tort, defined as "a wrongful act or an infringement of a right (other than under contract) leading to civil legal liability."

The former business partner, if the allegations are found true, is in violation of intellectual property laws, theft and possibly other legal theories which may be applicable given additional facts.  

There is no discussion of a contract; this is not a criminal offense; and there is no evidence of a prior judgment to be adjudicated.

You might be interested in
Unlike a grand jury, a petit jury
sveticcg [70]

Answer:

Its that already the whole question?

I dont understand it srry :(

6 0
3 years ago
If the defendant successfully proves __________, no matter how slight the plaintiff's negligence, the plaintiff will be denied a
Oliga [24]

Answer:

c. contributory negligence

Explanation:

Negligence occurs when a party does not do what is required of him in a given situation. It is being careless with one's responsibility.

Contributory negligence is when one does not show sufficient care for himself or is acts in such a way that contributes to an accident.

If a defendant is able to prove contributory negligence in the case of an accident the plaintiff will not be able to recover any damages.

For example if one enters a busy road when a green light for cars was on and there is an accident. He put himself in harm's way and will not be able to claim damages because he has contributory negligence

6 0
2 years ago
Evidence is:
nirvana33 [79]
the answer is definitely c or d, but im leaning more towards C
5 0
3 years ago
Question 7 (1 point)
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
advantages and disadvantages of the existence of political dynasty in the Philippines. Write a brief explanation for each item
Sloan [31]

Answer:

Disadvantages:

1. Undue Advantage due to the <em>Carnegie Effect</em>

Andrew Carnegie postulated that it was more discretionary for him to give out all his wealth to non-family member given that his children, given the expectation of inheritance of their father's estate, were most likely to have less incentive or motivation to work for themselves or build their own wealth. This thinking became known as the <em>Carnegie Effect.</em>

This effect is recurrent and prevalent among dynastic politicians as they are imbued with an advantage over their non-dynastic political peers right from birth. This means that regardless of their capabilities, they are more likely to, when faced with a non-dynastic politician, in an election.

This kind of effect is unhealthy for the political process of the Phillippines.

2. Abuse of power leading to graft, bribery, and conflicts of interests.

Dynasties in the Phillippines have been known to use their offices to enrich themselves at the expense of the state. Evidence also shows that the political system is rife with bribery, especially when a dynastic politician needs to have their own interests represented at the regardless of what is good for the state. It is not uncommon for the incumbent dynasty to suppress political opponents with better policy mandates as to how the state of Phillippines can run.

In the long run, this leads to the impoverishment and rigidity of state thus reducing its ability to respond to the development.

Advantages

1. Unlike non-dynastic politicians who have a limited term in office, Dynastic politicians, due to the long term of office, have a greater incentive to initiate, execute and complete long term projects, especially those within their jurisdiction. Continuity is good for economic development.

2. It is true that Dynastic politicians have an undue advantage in politics when compared to their non-dynastic counterparts. This undue advantage has led to the rise of female political leaders who use their dynastic connections (directly or indirectly) to come to power.

Cheers

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A temporary committee created to study an issue and make a policy recommendation is called a
    8·2 answers
  • The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state is generally an automatic basis for jurisdiction over the d
    13·1 answer
  • Describe at least three things you could do to uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror is supposed to do.
    5·1 answer
  • Which item is most commonly shoplifted?<br> meat<br> tools<br> building supplies<br> securities
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following amendments would protect you in the scenario found in the following question?
    9·1 answer
  • Examine the following cartoon. What does it suggest about U.S. foreign policy when
    8·2 answers
  • What type of law regulates government bureaucracies?
    6·2 answers
  • on the blank spaces, analyze the concentric circles and write a short interpretation based on your understanding​
    9·1 answer
  • Were the causes of the War of 1812 more political or economic? Do you think there was just cause for the US to declare war on Gr
    13·1 answer
  • How did the supreme court’s ruling in the trans-missouri freight association case strengthen the federal government’s power?.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!