What would be a disadvantage of tax payers and juveniles splitting court into two sections?

Law

2 answers:

topjm [15]4 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The Taxpayers wouldent be able to tax those who are juvinile

exis [7]4 years ago

6 0

<u>Disadvantage of tax payers and juveniles splitting court into two sections:</u>

The problem pertains to splitting of courts into two section is the financial problem, efficiency and proper service cannot be given to the individuals. The efficiency of the court is at stake when it is split into two sections.

And it also affects the routine working of the courts because it may require an additional workforce which if it is not fulfilled will lead to poor service. By creating additional courts or splitting into two sections it may also take a huge burden to taxpayers who have to incur an additional cost.

The functioning of the court is considered to big another big disadvantage because of issues pertaining to it. So, in conclusion, there are numerous socio-economic problems pertain to the splitting of the court into two sections.

You might be interested in

Besides a later Court decision, which can change a Supreme Court decision?

Vladimir [108]

An amendment

Hope this helps :)

4 0

3 years ago

What does Luca cause

fenix001 [56]

Answer:

Explanation:

Luca cause earthquakes. I heard about luca

6 0

2 years ago

Which of the following was made of 11 titles and enforced laws against<br> segregation?

Vikentia [17]

Answer:

you didn't leave any option choices so if I had to guess I'd say The Civil Rights Act of 1964

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is an example of a personal distraction?

lyudmila [28]

Answer:

B. You notice your hair sticking out.

Explanation:

A personal distraction is a distraction that has to do with you, yourself. Noticing your hair sticking out involves yourself.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

which criteria must a law meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate? select all tha

KatRina [158]

The criteria that law must meet in order to pass the government’s strict scrutiny test to reasonably discriminate includes"

It must further a compelling government interest
It must use the least restrictive means to achieve its purpose.

<h3>What is a strict scrutiny test?</h3>

In law, a strict scrutiny refers to the highest standard of review which a court will use to evaluate the constitutionality of governmental discrimination. In order for a law to pass strict scrutiny, the legislature must have passed the law to further a "compelling governmental interest" and must have narrowly tailored the law to achieve that interest.

This standard is the highest and most of the stringent standard of judicial review and is part of the levels of judicial scrutiny that courts use to determine whether a constitutional right or principle should give way to the government's interest against observance of the principle. However, the lesser standards are rational basis review and exacting or intermediate scrutiny and these standards are applied to statutes and government action at all levels of government within the United States.