Answer:
They won a few battles and asked france for help
Explanation:
One way in which the Federal Trade Commission (1914) and the Clayton Antitrust Act (1914) are similar is that both "<span>(2) attempted to correct abusive business practices," since they both aimed at curbing the monopolies that were dragging the US economy down. </span><span />
From the perspective of France, the Congress of Vienna's decisions were not fair. France lost almost all of the land it had gained during the Napoleonic Wars. As a result, it was put at a disadvantage.
The way I understand the question, this would be because political majorities would in principle be able to do anything, since they have the political power (even immoral things and things which are not compatible with constitution).
Judges can make sure that the laws introduced are not illegal (that is: are not at odds with the constitution) and in this way they keep the country safe from at least breaking the constitution.
Also, they can make sure that the political majorities don't abuse their power in other ways, such as imprison people without a trial. People then "prosecuted" by the political majority can go to a court and demand justice
