Answer:
She trusted what he said, but his actions revealed the truth or the truth him which is why his words now mean nothing. He didn't just cheat on her, he cheated on both of them. He didn't break her heart, he broke their future, as if they had plans for the future. He may never lie or cheat but if he get to steal, he should steal her sadness away. If he gets to lie, then he lies with her all the nights of her life. Lastly, if he must cheat, he should cheat death, because she wouldn't live a life with him or like she couldn't live without him as if he is the only thing she owns and that shows how strong the love she has towards him.
Explanation:
Maybe misunderstood the question, but hope it helped.
Answer:
Terrible, since for example, should we have rules? and nobody takes part in that, it goes into anarchy.
Explanation:
Man vs. self refers to someone who is having conflict within themselves. They are having trouble solving a problem for example.
The answer is 4 August 1944
Answer:
<u>past; third-person</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Yes, the excerpt from The Conjure-Man Dies is written in the<u> past tense</u>, from a <u>third-person</u> point of view.
In the English language, a tense refers to an indicator telling when an action occurs, while the past tense refers to an action that has happened before. The <u>third-person</u> point of view refers to a story told from the perspective of another person (the third party). It often using words like 'he, she, they.'