Andrew Jackson was known to be a United State President. The conclusion about President Andrew Jackson is most consistent with the above headlines is that He expanded presidential powers.
President Andrew Jackson was known as the seventh president of the United States. He was elected in 1828. He is highly regarded as the people's president.
His notable work is the destruction of the Second Bank of the United State and set up policies that led to the forced migration of Native Americans.
Conclusively, Andrew Jackson was known to fully transform the office of the presidency. He was known to expand the powers of the president by implementing new practices as the president.
See full question below
Jackson Replaces Many Government Workers
With His Supporters"
"Jackson Vetoes Bank Recharter Bill for Political
Reasons"
"Jackson Refuses to Enforce Worcester v. Georgia
Decision"
Which conclusion about President Andrew Jackson is most consistent with the above headlines?
a. Jackson relied on Congress to settle controversial issues.
b. Jackson expanded the powers of the Executive branch.
c. Jackson demonstrated weakness in dealing with domestic issues.
d. Jackson relied on the Supreme Court to settle disputes.
Learn more about President Andrew Jackson from:
brainly.com/question/1297968
Answer:
The intervention by some civilized nation can be caused by war and famine. Loss of property and other things can be caused through this and can cause intervention by some civilized nation.
Explanation:
N the first century CE, during the reign of Emperor Tiberius, silk had become a big problem. The luxury fabric, imported at great cost from China, had become a symbol of decadence and excess among Romans. In order to make their supply of silk last longer, merchants unraveled and re-wove their fabric into thinner, sheer garments. This practice had a side-effect of making the garments nearly transparent.
Seneca the Younger, a writer and imperial advisor, complained of people wearing silk:
"I can see clothes of silk, if materials that do not hide the body, nor even one's decency, can be called clothes. ... Wretched flocks of maids labor so that the adulteress may be visible through her thin dress, so that her husband has no more acquaintance than any outsider or foreigner with his wife's body.”
In the year 14 CE, the Roman historian Tacitus reported that the Imperial Senate made it illegal for men to wear silk, resolving that "Oriental [Eastern] silks should no longer degrade the male sex. "
This prohibition on silk did not last. The demand for silk continued to drive trade between the Roman Empire, China, India, and many places in between. To understand what caused this trade in silk, we need to look at how Chinese silk got to Rome.
