Answer:
The Monroe Doctrine was successful in keeping the United states out of European affairs because after it was issued there was a decrease in foreign conflict for nearly 100 years until WWI.
Explanation:
Based on this excerpt, we can infer that the point that Ida B. Wells is trying to make is that<u> D. </u><u>White men </u><u>rarely </u><u>embrace progressive </u><u>ideas without a </u><u>financial motive.</u>
Ida Bell Wells was:
- A journalist who reported on the racist actions of white people in the United States, especially in the South
- A Civil rights leader
- A key individual in the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP).
In this excerpt, Ida Bells is saying that in order to get a White man to listen to anything, one would need to convince them that there is a financial gain to be made.
In reference to the Progressive Era therefore, we can infer that Wells was of the opinion that White men would only support progressive ideals if they stood to make something from it.
In conclusion, Ida Wells was saying that white men rarely embrace progressive ideals unless they stand to gain financially.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/23500689. </em>
Like, Same, Similar... if your have trouble with synonyms or antonyms look on Thesaurus.com .... they'll give you bunches of answers..
One thing that happened in Iran during the Carter administration was Iranians seized the American embassy.
<h3>What happened in Iran when Carter was president?</h3><h3 />
When Carter was president, the Iranians revolted against their U.S. backed government and seized the American Embassy.
The Americans inside were held in what was known as the Iranian Hostage Crisis which severely undermined the Carter administration.
In conclusion, the Carter administration saw Iranians seizing the American embassy.
Find out more on the Iranian Hostage Crises at brainly.com/question/11886417
#SPJ1
The Embargo Act of 1807 was a general trade embargo on all foreign nations that was enacted by the US Congress. As a successor or replacement law for the 1806 Non-importation Act and passed as the Napoleonic Wars continued, it represented an escalation of attempts to coerce Britain to stop its impressment of American sailors and to respect American sovereignty and neutrality but also attempted to pressure France and other nations in the pursuit of In the first decade of the 19th century, American merchant shipping grew. Particularly Britain but also France thus targeted neutral American shipping as a means to disrupt enemy trade. American merchantmen, their cargo, and sometimes crew members were seized as contraband of war by European navies, sometimes under cover of official orders. The British Royal Navy, in particular, resorted to impressment and forced some American seamen into naval service on the pretext that the seamen had been "born British" and were still British subjects. Americans saw the Chesapeake–Leopard affair as a glaring example of a British violation of American neutrality.
Congress imposed the embargo in direct response to these events. US President Thomas Jefferson acted with restraint, weighed public support for retaliation, and recognized that the United States was far weaker than either Britain or France. He recommended that Congress respond with commercial warfare, a policy that appealed to Jefferson both for being experimental and for foreseeably harming his domestic political opponents more than his allies, whatever its effect on the European belligerents. The 10th Congress was controlled by his allies and agreed to the Act, which was signed into law on December 22, 1807.
The embargo failed totally. It did not improve the American diplomatic position, highlighted American weakness and lack of leverage, significantly damaged only the American economy, and sharply increased domestic political tensions. Both widespread evasion of the embargo and loopholes in the legislation reduced its impact on its targets. British commercial shipping, which already dominated global trade, was successfully adapting to Napoleon's Continental System by pursuing new markets, particularly in the restive Spanish and Portuguese South American colonies. Thus, British shippers were well-positioned to grow at American expense when the embargo reduced American trade activity.
The embargo undermined American unity by provoking bitter protests, particularly in New England commercial centers. Support for the declining Federalist Party, which intensely opposed Jefferson, temporarily rebounded and drove electoral gains in 1808. The embargo simultaneously undermined Americans' faith that their government could execute laws fairly and strengthened the European perception that the republican form of government was inept and ineffectual.
Replacement legislation for the ineffective embargo was enacted on March 1, 1809, in the last days of Jefferson's presidency. Tensions with Britain continued to grow and eventually led to the War of 1812. general diplomatic and economic leverage.
