The native Americans already had the first 3 items. The British brought horses to the new world and the native Americans used them a good bit Civil War and after.
In a standard fear-conditioning experiment, the subject is presented with an auditory conditional stimulus.
<h3>What is fear conditioning test?</h3>
The contextual and cued fear conditioning test is one of the most widely used paradigms to assess learning and memory.
This test is a form of Pavlovian conditioning in which an association is made between a context and/or a conditioned stimulus (auditory cue) and an aversive stimulus (electric footshock).
<h3>What is an example of fear conditioning?</h3><h3>Fear Conditioning Examples</h3>
In typical fear conditioning studies, a rat or rodent is not presented with the aversive stimulus in the home cage.
The animal is then placed in a novel environment, provided aversive stimuli, e.g. mild electrical shock in the foot, and subsequently removed.
Learn more about fear conditioning here:
<h3>
brainly.com/question/1299223</h3><h3 /><h3>#SPJ4</h3>
Answer:
elaboration is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
